frontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:anthropics/claude-plugins-official --skill frontend-designOverall
score
64%
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description has a solid structure with explicit 'Use when' guidance and communicates a clear value proposition around design quality. However, it lacks specific concrete actions and comprehensive trigger terms that would help Claude reliably select this skill over similar frontend or coding skills.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions like 'implement responsive layouts, create animations, design forms, build navigation components' to improve specificity.
Expand trigger terms to include common user phrases like 'UI', 'website', 'landing page', 'dashboard', 'HTML/CSS', 'React component', or file extensions like '.html', '.css'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (frontend interfaces) and mentions some actions (build web components, pages, applications, generates code), but lacks comprehensive specific actions like 'create responsive layouts, implement animations, style forms'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces') and when ('Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications') with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant keywords ('web components', 'pages', 'applications', 'frontend') but misses common variations users might say like 'UI', 'website', 'HTML', 'CSS', 'React', 'landing page', or 'dashboard'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The focus on 'high design quality' and avoiding 'generic AI aesthetics' provides some distinction, but 'web components, pages, or applications' could overlap with general coding skills or other frontend-related skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides solid conceptual guidance for creating distinctive frontend interfaces with clear aesthetic principles and anti-patterns to avoid. However, it lacks concrete code examples that would make it immediately actionable, and the workflow could benefit from explicit validation steps to ensure designs meet the stated quality bar. The content is moderately efficient but could be tightened.
Suggestions
Add 2-3 concrete code examples showing the aesthetic principles in action (e.g., a typography setup with distinctive fonts, a color system with CSS variables, an animation pattern)
Include a validation checklist or review criteria to verify the output avoids 'generic AI aesthetics' before delivery
Consider linking to external resources for font recommendations, color palette tools, or animation libraries rather than describing them inline
Trim philosophical statements about Claude's capabilities and focus on executable guidance
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary elaboration, particularly in the design philosophy sections. Phrases like 'Claude is capable of extraordinary creative work' and repeated emphasis on avoiding 'AI slop' could be trimmed without losing actionable value. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides good conceptual guidance and specific aesthetic principles (typography, color, motion) but lacks concrete, executable code examples. The skill describes what to do but doesn't show copy-paste ready implementations or specific code patterns. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Has a logical flow (understand context → choose direction → implement) but lacks explicit validation checkpoints. For a creative skill, there's no guidance on how to verify the output meets quality standards or iterate on designs. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is reasonably organized with clear sections (Design Thinking, Frontend Aesthetics Guidelines) but everything is inline. For a comprehensive design skill, references to example implementations, font resources, or animation pattern libraries would improve navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 13 / 16 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
body_output_format | No obvious output/return/format terms detected; consider specifying expected outputs | Warning |
body_steps | No step-by-step structure detected (no ordered list); consider adding a simple workflow | Warning |
Total | 13 / 16 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.