Content
83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The SKILL.md body is well-organized, directive, and uses progressive disclosure effectively with a clear sequenced workflow, validation checkpoints, and a strong self-review checklist. Its main weakness is mild redundancy in the launch-deferral guidance and the fact that executable specifics live in reference files rather than inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is directive and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, but repeats the 'use antithesis-launch, not snouty launch directly' guidance three times and could be tightened slightly, fitting 'efficient with minor instances that could be trimmed' rather than fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It points to concrete reference files, specific commands (snouty validate, snouty doctor, compose build), paths, and env vars, but delegates most executable detail to the reference files rather than embedding copy-paste-ready code in the body, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (directory-init → instrumentation → docker-images → docker-compose → config-dir → submit-and-test) with an explicit revisit-after-each-step feedback loop, mandatory provenance confirmation before durable output, and snouty validate/build checkpoints, plus a thorough Self-Review checklist — matching the explicit-validation anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references to real reference files (references/*.md) and assets (assets/antithesis/), each introduced with its purpose, giving easy navigation without nested indirection. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |