Automate Amplitude tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): events, user activity, cohorts, user identification. Always search tools first for current schemas.
67
Quality
60%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
68%
1.25xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/antigravity-amplitude-automation/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
57%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description adequately identifies its niche (Amplitude automation via a specific MCP) and lists relevant task categories, making it reasonably distinctive. However, it lacks concrete action verbs, misses common user-facing trigger terms like 'analytics' or 'tracking', and doesn't include an explicit 'Use when...' clause to guide skill selection.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks about Amplitude analytics, event tracking, cohort analysis, or product metrics.'
Include more natural trigger terms users would say: 'analytics', 'tracking', 'product analytics', 'user behavior', 'funnel analysis'
Replace category nouns with specific action verbs: 'Track events, query user activity, create and manage cohorts, identify users'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Amplitude via Rube MCP/Composio) and lists some actions (events, user activity, cohorts, user identification), but these are more like categories than concrete actions. Missing specific verbs like 'track', 'query', 'create', 'export'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Describes what it does (automate Amplitude tasks) and includes a procedural note ('Always search tools first'), but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause. The when is only implied through the task categories listed. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant keywords like 'Amplitude', 'events', 'cohorts', 'user activity' that users might say. However, 'Rube MCP' and 'Composio' are technical/internal terms unlikely to be used by end users, and common variations like 'analytics', 'tracking', 'product analytics' are missing. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clearly targets Amplitude specifically, which is a distinct product analytics platform. The mention of 'Rube MCP (Composio)' further narrows the scope. Unlikely to conflict with other skills unless there are multiple Amplitude-related skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides comprehensive coverage of Amplitude operations with clear workflow sequences and good pitfall documentation. However, it's verbose for a skill file, lacks executable code examples for most operations, and could be more concise by assuming Claude's familiarity with concepts like async patterns and API conventions.
Suggestions
Add complete, executable tool call examples showing actual parameter structures rather than abstract descriptions (e.g., show a full RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS call followed by AMPLITUDE_SEND_EVENTS with real parameters)
Consolidate the 'Known Pitfalls' section with workflow-specific pitfalls to reduce redundancy - currently user ID confusion is explained in multiple places
Consider splitting detailed workflow documentation into a separate WORKFLOWS.md file, keeping SKILL.md as a quick-start overview with the reference table
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some redundancy (pitfalls repeated across sections, verbose explanations of concepts like async operations that Claude understands). The quick reference table duplicates information already covered in workflows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides tool names and parameter lists, but lacks executable code examples. The 'Example structure' JSON snippet is helpful, but most workflows describe steps abstractly rather than showing actual tool calls with complete parameters. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced with explicit prerequisites, tool sequences marked as [Required]/[Optional], and async operation patterns include proper status-checking loops. The ID resolution patterns provide clear feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized with clear sections, but everything is in one file. The skill is quite long (~200 lines) and could benefit from splitting detailed workflow documentation into separate files, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
5c5ae21
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.