Generate comprehensive, developer-friendly API documentation from code, including endpoints, parameters, examples, and best practices
65
Quality
47%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
99%
1.11xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/antigravity-api-documentation-generator/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description effectively communicates specific capabilities for API documentation generation with concrete deliverables (endpoints, parameters, examples, best practices). However, it lacks explicit trigger guidance ('Use when...') and could benefit from additional natural keywords users might employ when requesting this functionality.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger scenarios like 'when the user asks to document an API, generate API docs, or create endpoint documentation'
Include common keyword variations users might say: 'docs', 'swagger', 'OpenAPI', 'REST API', 'API reference', '.yaml', '.json'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Generate comprehensive, developer-friendly API documentation from code, including endpoints, parameters, examples, and best practices' - covers documentation generation with specific deliverables. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers 'what' (generate API documentation with specific components) but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause or trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Contains relevant keywords like 'API documentation', 'endpoints', 'parameters', but missing common variations users might say like 'docs', 'swagger', 'OpenAPI', 'REST API', or file extensions. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused specifically on API documentation generation from code - distinct from general documentation skills or code generation skills, with specific domain markers like 'endpoints' and 'parameters'. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
27%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is excessively verbose, explaining basic concepts Claude already understands while providing lengthy example outputs rather than actionable instructions. The content would benefit from dramatic condensation—focusing on the specific documentation patterns and formats Claude should use, with detailed examples moved to separate reference files. The workflow lacks validation steps to ensure generated documentation accuracy.
Suggestions
Reduce content by 70%+ by removing explanations of basic concepts (REST, GraphQL, authentication) and assuming Claude's competence with API documentation fundamentals
Move the extensive example outputs (REST endpoint, GraphQL, auth documentation) to a separate EXAMPLES.md file and reference it from the main skill
Add validation checkpoints to the workflow, such as 'Verify all documented endpoints exist in codebase' and 'Test example requests against actual API'
Replace the verbose 'Best Practices' and 'Common Pitfalls' sections with a concise checklist that Claude can reference during documentation generation
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose with extensive explanations of concepts Claude already knows (what REST APIs are, what authentication is, basic HTTP methods). The document is over 400 lines when the core actionable content could be conveyed in under 100 lines. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete examples of documentation output formats (REST, GraphQL, auth docs), but these are examples of what to generate rather than executable code Claude would run. The skill describes a process rather than providing tools or commands to execute. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-5 outline a clear sequence for documentation generation, but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops. No guidance on how to verify the generated documentation is accurate or complete. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Monolithic wall of text with everything inline. The 'Related Skills' and 'Additional Resources' sections reference external content, but the main body contains extensive examples and best practices that should be split into separate reference files. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
5c5ae21
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.