CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

brand-guidelines

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

95

6.18x
Quality

56%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

6.18x

Average score across 10 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/anthropic-brand-guidelines/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

89%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong description that clearly communicates its purpose and includes an explicit 'Use when' clause with good trigger terms. Its main weakness is that the capability description could be more specific about the concrete actions performed beyond 'applies brand colors and typography'. The phrase 'any sort of artifact that may benefit' is somewhat vague but acceptable given the broad applicability of brand styling.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (Anthropic brand styling) and some actions ('applies brand colors and typography'), but doesn't list multiple specific concrete actions like 'set heading fonts, apply color palette to charts, format buttons with brand styles'. The phrase 'any sort of artifact that may benefit' is vague.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (applies Anthropic's brand colors and typography to artifacts) and 'when' (explicitly states 'Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply'). The 'Use when' clause is explicit.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural trigger terms: 'brand colors', 'typography', 'Anthropic', 'look-and-feel', 'style guidelines', 'visual formatting', 'company design standards'. These cover a good range of terms a user would naturally use when requesting brand styling.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive — specifically scoped to Anthropic's brand identity, which is a clear niche. Unlikely to conflict with generic styling or design skills because it explicitly names 'Anthropic's official brand colors' and 'company design standards'.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Implementation

22%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill serves as a brand reference sheet but fails as an actionable skill — it tells Claude what the brand values are but never shows how to apply them. The repeated font fallback information across multiple sections wastes tokens, and the complete absence of executable code or step-by-step workflow means Claude would have to figure out the implementation entirely on its own. The color hex values and font choices are useful reference data, but the skill needs concrete implementation examples to be effective.

Suggestions

Add executable code examples showing how to apply brand colors and fonts (e.g., a python-pptx snippet setting slide background to #faf9f5 and heading font to Poppins)

Define a clear workflow: e.g., 1. Identify artifact type, 2. Apply background colors, 3. Style headings, 4. Style body text, 5. Apply accent colors to shapes, 6. Verify output

Remove redundant sections — consolidate font fallback info into one place and merge 'Features' content into the guidelines or a single implementation section

Remove the keywords line — it serves no purpose for Claude's understanding and wastes tokens

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

There's some redundancy — font fallback behavior is mentioned in at least three places (Typography, Smart Font Application, Font Management), and the 'Features' section largely restates what's already in 'Brand Guidelines'. The keywords line adds no value for Claude. However, the core color/typography reference data is reasonably compact.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill describes brand values (colors, fonts) but provides no executable code, no concrete commands, and no examples of how to actually apply these styles. There's no code snippet showing how to use python-pptx's RGBColor, how to set fonts on slides, or any copy-paste-ready implementation. It describes rather than instructs.

1 / 3

Workflow Clarity

There is no workflow, sequence of steps, or process described. The skill is purely declarative — it lists brand assets but never explains how to apply them to an artifact. There are no validation steps or any indication of what order operations should happen in.

1 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is organized into logical sections with clear headings, which is good. However, there are no references to external files for deeper detail, and the redundant sections (Features restating Guidelines, Font Management restating Typography) suggest the content could be better structured. It's not a wall of text but isn't optimally organized either.

2 / 3

Total

6

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
boisenoise/skills-collections
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.