Content
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a comprehensive, well-organized reference for clean code standards with specific thresholds and rules. Its strengths are conciseness and clear categorization. However, it reads more as a reference document than an actionable skill—lacking executable examples, validation workflows, and links to detailed implementation guides for each standard.
Suggestions
Add executable code examples for key standards (e.g., a branded type example, a proper exhaustive switch pattern, a structured logging snippet)
Include a validation workflow showing how to check compliance: run command → interpret output → fix issues → re-validate
Link to separate detailed files for complex pillars (e.g., 'See [TYPE_SAFETY.md](TYPE_SAFETY.md) for branded type patterns and guard examples')
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, using bullet points and tables to convey information without unnecessary explanation. It assumes Claude understands concepts like type safety, git, and architecture patterns without explaining them. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides specific rules and thresholds (e.g., 'max 350 lines', '90% coverage') but lacks executable code examples. The guidance is concrete but descriptive rather than copy-paste ready commands or code snippets. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'When to Invoke Crusades' table provides clear situational guidance, but there's no validation workflow or feedback loop for applying these standards. Missing explicit steps for how to actually run checks or verify compliance. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized with clear sections and a reference table, but everything is inline in one file. The crusade commands suggest external functionality but no links to detailed documentation for each pillar or crusade. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |