Lists multiple specific concrete actions: decomposes requirements into dependency-sorted CSV tasks, computes execution waves, runs wave-by-wave via spawn_agents_on_csv, and propagates cross-wave context.

Describes what it does (decomposes requirements, computes waves, runs tasks) but completely lacks any 'Use when...' clause or explicit trigger guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 2, and the 'what' is also described in implementation-centric rather than user-facing terms, pushing it to 1.

Uses highly technical jargon like 'wave-based CSV execution pipeline', 'spawn_agents_on_csv', 'cross-wave context propagation' that users would never naturally say. Missing natural trigger terms a user might use like 'plan tasks', 'break down requirements', or 'parallel execution'.

The mention of 'spawn_agents_on_csv' and 'wave-based' execution is fairly niche, but 'requirement planning' is broad enough to overlap with general planning or task decomposition skills. The technical specificity helps somewhat but the vague 'requirement planning' prefix introduces conflict risk.

The skill is extremely verbose at ~600+ lines. It includes full CSV parsing utility functions, complete instruction template strings, extensive code for every phase, and detailed CSV schema examples that could be in separate reference files. Much of this (CSV parsing, topological sort algorithms, session management boilerplate) is implementation detail Claude could derive from a concise specification.

The skill provides fully executable JavaScript code for every phase: session initialization, wave computation (complete Kahn's algorithm), CSV generation, wave execution with spawn_agents_on_csv calls, result merging, and report generation. The instruction template, output schema, and CSV schemas are all concrete and copy-paste ready.

The three-phase workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: user validation after Phase 1, dependency checking before each wave, result merging after each wave, and retry logic for failed tasks. Error handling table covers all failure modes with resolutions. The skip-on-failure pattern and wave ordering rules are explicit.

Everything is in a single monolithic file with no bundle files or external references. The CSV utility functions, instruction template, handoff intake logic, and detailed CSV schema documentation could all be split into separate reference files. The content is a wall of code and tables that would benefit greatly from progressive disclosure.