skill-simplify
SKILL.md simplification with functional integrity verification. Analyze redundancy, optimize content, check no functionality lost. Triggers on "simplify skill", "optimize skill", "skill-simplify".
68
83%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a solid description that clearly identifies its niche (SKILL.md simplification), provides explicit trigger terms, and answers both what and when. The main weakness is that the capability descriptions could be more concrete—terms like 'optimize content' and 'check no functionality lost' are somewhat abstract. Overall it performs well for skill selection purposes.
Suggestions
Make actions more concrete, e.g., 'Removes duplicate instructions, consolidates overlapping sections, and verifies all documented behaviors are preserved' instead of 'analyze redundancy, optimize content, check no functionality lost'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (SKILL.md simplification) and some actions (analyze redundancy, optimize content, check no functionality lost), but the actions are somewhat vague and not fully concrete—'optimize content' and 'check no functionality lost' lack specificity about how these are accomplished. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (simplification with functional integrity verification, analyze redundancy, optimize content) and 'when' (explicit triggers: 'simplify skill', 'optimize skill', 'skill-simplify'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural trigger terms users would say: 'simplify skill', 'optimize skill', 'skill-simplify'. These are realistic phrases a user would type when wanting this functionality, and the domain term 'SKILL.md' is clearly stated. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche—SKILL.md file simplification with integrity verification. The trigger terms are distinct and unlikely to conflict with other skills since they specifically reference 'skill' simplification/optimization. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill with efficient content organization and clear workflow sequencing. Its main strength is the concise three-phase pipeline with explicit error handling and integrity verification. The primary weakness is that actionability depends heavily on the phase reference documents which aren't provided, and the core rules, while specific, lack concrete before/after examples that would make them immediately executable.
Suggestions
Add a brief concrete before/after example showing a simplification transformation (e.g., a verbose section reduced to its functional essence) to improve actionability without the phase documents.
Provide the bundle files (phases/01-analysis.md, phases/02-optimize.md, phases/03-check.md) so the progressive disclosure structure can be fully realized and verified.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, uses tables for structured data, and every section serves a clear purpose. No unnecessary padding or explanations of basic concepts. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete JavaScript code for input processing and TodoWrite patterns, plus specific rules and error handling. However, the actual optimization logic is deferred to phase documents that aren't provided, and the core rules are directive rather than fully executable — they describe what to do but lack concrete examples of before/after transformations. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-phase pipeline is clearly sequenced with explicit validation in Phase 3. The error handling table provides concrete feedback loops — particularly the 'Check FAIL' case which specifies reverting to original and reporting lost elements. The TodoWrite pattern shows explicit status tracking across phases. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references three phase documents via a well-organized table with clear purposes, which is good structure. However, no bundle files are provided, so the referenced phase documents (phases/01-analysis.md, phases/02-optimize.md, phases/03-check.md) cannot be verified to exist. The SKILL.md itself is appropriately sized as an overview, but the missing bundle makes it impossible to confirm the references work. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow
- Commit
5ff5e86
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.