CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

team-uidesign

Unified team skill for UI design team. Research -> design tokens -> audit -> implementation. Uses team-worker agent architecture with roles/ for domain logic. Coordinator orchestrates dual-track pipeline with GC loops and sync points. Triggers on "team ui design", "ui design team".

53

Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.codex/skills/team-uidesign/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted orchestration skill that provides clear, actionable guidance for a multi-agent UI design pipeline. Its strengths are the explicit delegation lock, concrete spawn templates, and clear progressive disclosure to role-specific files. The main weakness is moderate verbosity — some sections could be tightened without losing clarity, particularly the model selection rationale and the near-duplicate spawn examples.

Suggestions

Consolidate the two spawn_agent examples (Worker Spawn Template and Research-to-Design Context Flow) into a single template with a note about upstream context variation, reducing redundancy.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is fairly well-structured and avoids explaining basic concepts, but it's quite long with some redundancy (e.g., the spawn template is shown twice with slight variations, the delegation lock table is thorough but verbose). Some sections like 'Model Selection Guide' rationale column add marginal value.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides concrete, executable guidance throughout: exact spawn_agent call templates with parameters, specific tool call allowlists, precise file paths, timeout values (1800000ms), and clear decision logic (role router parsing). The delegation lock table is immediately actionable with ALLOWED/BLOCKED verdicts.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The multi-step pipeline is clearly sequenced (research -> design -> review -> implementation) with explicit validation checkpoints: GC loop max of 2 rounds, agent health checks via list_agents, timeout escalation protocol (STATUS_CHECK -> FINALIZE -> close), and error handling table covering edge cases. The research-to-design context flow shows explicit data handoff between stages.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md serves as a clear router/overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to role files (roles/<name>/role.md), specs (specs/pipelines.md), and session directory structure. The role registry table provides direct links to each role's detailed instructions, and the architecture diagram makes navigation intuitive.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

35%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description focuses heavily on internal architecture (agent roles, dual-track pipeline, GC loops, sync points) rather than user-facing capabilities, making it difficult for Claude to match against natural user requests. The trigger terms are artificial command phrases rather than natural language a user would employ. While it identifies a clear domain (UI design), it fails to articulate concrete outcomes or provide natural trigger coverage.

Suggestions

Replace artificial trigger phrases with natural user language: add terms like 'design system', 'design tokens', 'UI audit', 'component library', 'accessibility review', 'style guide', 'color palette', 'typography system'.

Remove internal implementation details (GC loops, sync points, team-worker agent architecture) and replace with concrete user-facing actions like 'Creates design token systems, audits UI components for consistency, generates implementation-ready design specifications'.

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause describing real user scenarios, e.g., 'Use when the user needs end-to-end UI design work including research, token creation, design auditing, or implementation guidance.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names a domain (UI design) and mentions some actions (research, design tokens, audit, implementation), but these are listed as pipeline stages rather than concrete user-facing capabilities. Terms like 'GC loops', 'sync points', and 'team-worker agent architecture' are internal implementation details, not specific actions.

2 / 3

Completeness

It partially answers 'what' (UI design pipeline with research, tokens, audit, implementation) and has explicit trigger terms, but the 'when' guidance is extremely narrow and unnatural. The trigger clause exists but is so specific and artificial ('team ui design') that it barely functions as real usage guidance.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The explicit triggers ('team ui design', 'ui design team') are unnatural phrases that users would rarely say. Natural terms like 'design system', 'UI components', 'style guide', 'color tokens', or 'accessibility audit' are entirely missing. The listed triggers feel like command keywords rather than natural language.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The very specific trigger phrases ('team ui design') reduce conflict risk, but the broad domain description ('UI design team') could overlap with individual design-related skills. The description doesn't clearly delineate boundaries from other UI or design skills.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.