CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

coding-standards

Use when writing or reviewing TypeScript in this repo. Covers the no-`any` rule and where to put new types, the uppercase-acronym style guide, and the rules for code comments (no historical context). (project)

80

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable standards skill: concrete examples, explicit file-path guidance, a sequenced decision process, and a self-checking smell test. It stays lean while remaining fully executable as guidance.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no preamble explaining what TypeScript or comments are, and every section delivers rules plus brief rationale rather than padding.

3 / 3

Actionability

Concrete, copy-ready guidance throughout: a do/don't acronym table, bad/good comment code blocks, and exact file paths ('packages/shared/src/types.ts') for placing new types.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The no-`any` section gives a clear numbered process (find existing type → define in the right location → use everywhere) and the comment section closes with a 'smell test' checklist; no destructive/batch operation requires a validation loop here.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained SKILL.md with well-organized ## sections and no bundle files; references are not needed, so clear organization alone satisfies the anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, specific description that clearly states capabilities and an explicit use-when trigger, well-scoped to the repo. It does not pad with buzzwords or over-claim.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete rules — 'the no-`any` rule and where to put new types, the uppercase-acronym style guide, and the rules for code comments' — matching the anchor for several specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (the named rules) and when ('Use when writing or reviewing TypeScript in this repo'), satisfying the anchor for clearly answering both.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

'Use when writing or reviewing TypeScript in this repo' uses natural phrasing a user would say, supplemented by terms like 'style guide' and 'code comments'; good coverage of common variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to TypeScript standards in this repo with distinct triggers, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
cloudflare/sandbox-sdk
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.