Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, highly actionable, and well-organized with concrete commands and a clear table of available examples. The main gap is workflow clarity: the new-example checklist lacks an explicit build/validate feedback loop.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint to 'Adding a New Example' — e.g., step 4 as 'Run npm run dev and confirm it starts; if the image is stale, run npm run docker:rebuild and retry' — to turn the build check into a verify-fix-retry loop.
Consider a short 'Verify your changes' note covering both the build and a clean-checkout smoke test, so the workflow guards against the stale-image failure mode already mentioned in the tips section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it gives commands and facts ('npm run dev', 'npm run docker:rebuild') without explaining what Docker or wrangler are, and every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: exact commands ('npm run dev', 'npm run docker:rebuild', 'docker images | grep sandbox'), a copyable starting-point instruction ('Copy examples/minimal/'), and specific edit targets (package.json name, wrangler.jsonc bindings). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Adding a New Example' section is a clear numbered sequence, but it has no validation checkpoint — step 4 says 'Make sure the example builds and npm run dev works' as an instruction rather than a verify-and-fix loop, and the local-dev tips lack an explicit validate-then-proceed pattern. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into focused sections with no external bundle files to reference; for a short single-purpose skill, the sectioned overview (Running, Available Examples, EXPOSE, Adding, Tips) is appropriately structured and easy to navigate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |