Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable testing skill with exact commands, paths, and a copy-paste E2E example. It is efficient and clearly organized, with only minor conciseness redundancy and no explicit failure-retry loop in the dev workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit failure/retry step to the dev workflow (e.g., 'If `npm run check` fails, fix type errors before running tests') to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Collapse the per-suite 'When to use' bullets into the 'When to Use Which' table to remove the slight redundancy and tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and assumes Claude's competence (no explanations of vitest or unit-testing concepts), with slight redundancy between the per-suite 'When to use' notes and the 'When to Use Which' table keeping it just shy of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides exact copy-paste commands, concrete file paths, specific mock helpers (createNoOpLogger() from @repo/shared), and a complete executable E2E test example covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Running Tests During Development' section gives a clear ordered sequence (check → unit test → e2e) with implicit checkpoints, but lacks an explicit failure/retry feedback loop; this is a non-destructive dev workflow so the destructive-cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so all content lives in a single well-organized file with clear headers and easy navigation; the E2E writing example and conventions section are reasonable inline rather than needing separate files, but the skill exceeds 50 lines so it does not fully qualify for the simple-skill 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |