Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured skill body with concrete commands, a validated multi-step workflow, and clean one-level progressive disclosure. Its main weakness is minor redundancy where the mandatory two-step workflow is repeated across sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the mandatory two-step workflow into one authoritative section and have Step 1 reference it rather than restating it, to reduce redundancy and lift conciseness.
Prune jq examples that duplicate commands already shown in the workflow section, keeping only the novel transformations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense with executable commands and free of conceptual fluff, but the mandatory two-step workflow is restated in both 'Authoritative Billable Usage Queries' and 'Step 1', and jq examples re-run commands already shown, so it could be tightened per anchor 2; not 3 due to this redundancy, not 1 because there is no padding about concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable cx commands with flags, jq pipelines, and PromQL queries that are copy-paste ready, matching anchor 3. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step investigation workflow with explicit verification ('Verify after changes: Re-run the diagnosis commands to confirm the change took effect'), a --yes approval safety gate, and template-from-existing feedback loops, satisfying anchor 3; not capped at 2 because validation steps are present for the destructive write operations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single real, one-level-deep reference (references/data-usage-query-api.md) signaled inline and in a 'Reference Files' section, with the overview kept in SKILL.md and detail split out, matching anchor 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |