document-in-case

Add a comment to a case to document findings, actions, or recommendations. Use to maintain audit trail during investigations. Requires CASE_ID and comment text.

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/document-in-case/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is efficient and actionable with concrete code and useful templates organized into clean sections; its main weakness is the thin, non-executable verification step.

Suggestions

Make Step 2 concrete by showing what to check, e.g. 'Confirm the response contains a success status code and the returned comment_id; retry on failure.'

Provide a minimal code snippet for verification (e.g., asserting response.get('status') == 'success') rather than a prose instruction.

Clarify how COMMENT_POST_STATUS should be set from the response so the Outputs contract is unambiguous.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean with no concept explanations Claude already knows; the only mild redundancy is the opening sentence restating the description, and 'Check the API response...' is slightly hand-wavy but brief.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete callable code for the primary action (secops-soar.post_case_comment with named parameters) plus ready-to-use comment templates, but Step 2's verification ('Check the API response to confirm...') lacks concrete executable guidance.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear two-step sequence (Post Comment, Verify Status) with an explicit verification step; the checkpoint is present but vague about what success looks like, leaving a minor validation gap rather than a missing one.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	For a simple single-purpose skill with no bundle files, the body is well-organized into Inputs, Workflow, Outputs, and Comment Templates sections with clear headers and no nested or buried references.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is clear and mostly complete with an explicit trigger clause, but its action vocabulary is narrow and the trigger phrasing leans formal rather than natural for an analyst.

Suggestions

Broaden the action list beyond a single 'Add a comment' to enumerate concrete documented actions (e.g., 'log enrichment results, record triage decisions, append investigation updates').

Rewrite the 'when' clause in natural user phrasing, e.g. 'Use when an analyst needs to record findings, actions, or recommendations in a SOAR case during an investigation.'

Add common trigger synonyms such as 'case notes', 'case update', or 'audit logging' to improve retrieval against varied analyst phrasing.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (case documentation) and one concrete action ('Add a comment to a case to document findings, actions, or recommendations'), but the action is singular and not a comprehensive list of capabilities.	3 / 5
Completeness	Has both a clear 'what' (add a comment to document findings/actions/recommendations) and an explicit 'when' trigger ('Use to maintain audit trail during investigations'), but the 'when' could be more concrete with specific trigger phrases.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes relevant keywords like 'case', 'findings', 'audit trail', and 'investigations', but 'Use to maintain audit trail' is more formal-technical than the natural phrasing an analyst would say, and common synonyms are missing.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The SOAR case context and explicit 'Requires CASE_ID' constraint carve a clear niche, though 'document findings' could overlap marginally with other investigation skills.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: dandye/ai-runbooks
Path: skills/document-in-case/SKILL.md
Commit: 72a6863

Reviewed: 6 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.