document-in-case
Add a comment to a case to document findings, actions, or recommendations. Use to maintain audit trail during investigations. Requires CASE_ID and comment text.
78
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/document-in-case/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
75%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a solid skill description that clearly communicates its purpose and when to use it. The description excels at completeness by including explicit trigger conditions and required parameters. However, it could benefit from additional trigger terms and more specific capability details beyond the single 'add comment' action.
Suggestions
Add common user phrase variations like 'add note to case', 'annotate case', 'log case activity' to improve trigger term coverage
Consider expanding specific capabilities if applicable (e.g., 'Add comments, attach evidence, tag stakeholders') to increase specificity
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (case comments) and a specific action (add a comment), but only describes one action rather than multiple concrete capabilities. The phrase 'document findings, actions, or recommendations' adds some specificity but remains somewhat general. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Add a comment to a case to document findings, actions, or recommendations') and when ('Use to maintain audit trail during investigations'). Also specifies required inputs (CASE_ID and comment text), providing explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant terms like 'comment', 'case', 'CASE_ID', 'audit trail', and 'investigations', but missing common variations users might say like 'add note', 'case notes', 'annotate', or 'log activity'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The combination of 'case', 'CASE_ID', 'audit trail', and 'investigations' creates a clear niche in case management/investigation workflows. Unlikely to conflict with general document or note-taking skills due to the specific domain context. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, concise skill that clearly documents how to add comments to SOAR cases. The comment templates are a valuable addition for standardization. However, the workflow lacks concrete validation code and error handling, and the API call example is pseudocode rather than executable.
Suggestions
Make the API call example fully executable with proper syntax (e.g., Python with actual parameter passing)
Add concrete validation in Step 2 showing how to check the response object for success/failure and what to do on error
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is lean and efficient with no unnecessary explanations. Every section serves a purpose - inputs, workflow, outputs, and templates are all directly actionable without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete API call pattern and useful comment templates, but the code is pseudocode-style (not fully executable Python/JS) and Step 2 'Verify Status' is vague without showing how to actually check the response. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Two-step workflow is listed but Step 2 lacks specificity - no concrete validation code or error handling guidance. For an API operation, should show what success/failure looks like and how to handle errors. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines, the content is well-organized with clear sections (Inputs, Workflow, Outputs, Templates). No need for external references given the scope. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- dandye/ai-runbooks
- Commit
4d132c7
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.