Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable threat-hunting skill with a clear sequenced workflow and concrete query examples. Main improvement is replacing placeholder queries in Step 3 with real executable examples and trimming redundant input examples.
Suggestions
Replace the placeholder queries in Step 3 ('Advanced UDM query targeting specific behaviors', 'Complex analytical query') with concrete executable examples like the ones already in the Example Hunt Queries section.
Trim the three HUNT_HYPOTHESIS example bullets to one or two to reduce token overhead without losing clarity.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the hunt loop (e.g., confirm a lead is not noise before pivoting) to strengthen the existing feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what threat hunting or TTPs are), though the three example lines for HUNT_HYPOTHESIS could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete MCP calls and fully-formed UDM example queries, but some Step 3 queries are placeholders ('Advanced UDM query targeting specific behaviors', 'Complex analytical query') rather than executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An eight-step sequence is clearly laid out with an iterative hunt loop acting as a feedback mechanism; it is analysis rather than destructive work, so the missing hard validation checkpoint is a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file skill with clear section headers and no nested references; no bundle files are needed or referenced, and structure is easy to navigate. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |