Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, token-efficient security skill that leverages tables and checklists effectively. Its main strength is the progressive disclosure pattern — a scannable quick-reference table backed by detailed reference files. The primary weakness is the absence of inline executable code examples in the main body, relying entirely on reference files for concrete code, which slightly reduces immediate actionability.
Suggestions
Add 1-2 brief inline Go code examples for the most common patterns (e.g., parameterized SQL query, safe error handling) to improve actionability without needing to consult reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place. The table format is extremely token-efficient for conveying CWE-to-rule mappings. No unnecessary explanations of what CWEs are or how Go works. The checklist is dense but each item is actionable and non-obvious. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The quick-reference table provides specific functions and patterns (e.g., `filepath.Abs + strings.HasPrefix`, `exec.Command(name, arg1, arg2)`), and the checklist is concrete. However, the skill itself contains no executable code examples — those are deferred to reference files. The rules are specific enough to act on but lack copy-paste-ready code snippets in the main body. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The mandatory checklist at the end provides a clear validation workflow with an explicit feedback loop: 'If any check fails, fix the issue and re-run the full checklist before presenting code.' The sequence is clear: apply rules → write code → run checklist → fix if needed → re-run checklist. This is appropriate for a code generation skill. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent structure: quick-reference table for fast lookup, core principles for orientation, and clearly signaled one-level-deep references to three specific files (cwe-web.md, cwe-system.md, error-and-input.md) with explicit content descriptions. The instruction 'Read these when the quick-reference table is insufficient' perfectly signals when to drill down. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |