Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable, concise, and features an exemplary validated workflow, but progressive disclosure is undercut by missing referenced bundle files and a fair amount of detail kept inline. Fixing the broken references would raise the overall quality.
Suggestions
Create the missing references/ files (1-widget-specifications.md, 2-filters.md, 3-examples.md, 4-troubleshooting.md) so the signaled navigation actually resolves.
Move the inline widget field-expression and layout detail into 1-widget-specifications.md to keep SKILL.md a true overview, keeping only the workflow and rules in the body.
Verify referenced paths match actual bundle filenames to avoid dead links.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with tables, JSON/SQL snippets, and concrete rules, with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; the repeated CRITICAL/WARNING emphasis is the only minor padding and each line carries actionable information. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides executable JSON field expressions, exact tool actions with required params, copy-paste manage_dashboard examples, and precise layout/cardinality rules — fully concrete and instruction-ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A five-step workflow is explicitly sequenced with a mandatory validation checkpoint (STEP 3: TEST EVERY QUERY), a fix-and-retry feedback loop, and an 11-item pre-deploy quality checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The "What are you building?" table signals one-level-deep references well, but the referenced files (1-widget-specifications.md, 2-filters.md, 3-examples.md, 4-troubleshooting.md) do not exist in a references/ directory, so navigation is broken, and substantial spec detail is inline rather than split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |