Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable API reference for the Intercom toolkit, with real strengths in concrete tool names, parameters, and copy-paste query examples. Its weaknesses are systematic duplication (table + workflows + pitfalls repeat the same facts), missing validation checkpoints around destructive operations, and a monolithic single-file layout with no progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add validation checkpoints before destructive or non-idempotent operations (e.g., fetch and confirm the conversation state before DETACH_A_CONTACT or close, verify the reply was not already sent before retrying).
De-duplicate: the Quick Reference table and the Known Pitfalls section largely restate the per-workflow tool lists and pitfalls — keep one canonical form and trim the rest.
Move the Quick Reference table and per-tool parameter details into a references/ file (e.g., references/tools.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense reference material with no padding about concepts Claude already knows, but it is systematically redundant: the Quick Reference table repeats each workflow's tool list, and the admin-ID requirement is stated in workflows 1, 2, and 4 and again under Known Pitfalls. This fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' better than anchor 4, which expects only minor trims. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool slugs (INTERCOM_REPLY_TO_CONVERSATION), named parameters (conversation_id, admin_id, assignee_id), copy-paste JSON filter examples, and explicit pagination cursor guidance make the guidance mostly executable. It falls short of anchor 5 only because no complete end-to-end invocation example with a full parameter payload is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each workflow has a clearly labeled tool sequence with [Prerequisite]/[Optional] markers, and setup includes a checkpoint ('Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows'). However, destructive and batch operations — DETACH_A_CONTACT, close/reopen, and non-idempotent create/reply — lack validation or verification steps, which per the rubric guidelines caps workflow clarity at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files at all, and the ~245-line body inlines the full API detail (per-tool parameter lists plus a 20-row Quick Reference table) that belongs in a separate reference file. Section headers give it real structure, but content that should be separate is inline — matching anchor 3 rather than anchor 4's 'most content appropriately placed'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |