Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable reference for Linear automation with clear sequenced workflows and a useful Quick Reference table. The main weakness is moderate redundancy across sections and the absence of example argument payloads and post-mutation validation steps.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated priority-value and team-scoping pitfalls into a single source of truth to reduce token redundancy.
Add at least one example call with concrete argument values (e.g., a sample LINEAR_CREATE_LINEAR_ISSUE payload) to strengthen actionability.
Add a verification step after create/update workflows (e.g., re-fetch the issue to confirm changes) to add explicit feedback loops.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly token-efficient reference material with concrete tool slugs and parameters, but priority values and team-scoping pitfalls are repeated across Core Workflows, Known Pitfalls, and the Quick Reference, which could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool sequences with exact slugs and key parameters plus a task-to-tool Quick Reference table, but lacks example argument payloads showing actual values for a call. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflows are clearly sequenced with numbered tool lists and prerequisite/optional markers, and Setup includes an explicit ACTIVE-status checkpoint, though post-mutation verification (e.g., confirm an issue was created) is absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with no bundle files and is organized into clear sections (Prerequisites, Setup, Core Workflows, Common Patterns, Known Pitfalls, Quick Reference), but at ~185 lines the redundancy between pitfalls and the reference table is a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |