CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

miro-automation

Automate Miro tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): boards, items, sticky notes, frames, sharing, connectors. Always search tools first for current schemas.

75

2.41x
Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

94%

2.41x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/all-skills/skills/miro-automation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and actionable with concrete MCP tool sequences and parameters, but it is held back by redundant pitfalls content and missing validation checkpoints on batch and sharing operations. Progressive disclosure is sound for a single-file skill.

Suggestions

Add a verification step after batch creation and after sharing (e.g., re-fetch items or GET_BOARD_MEMBERS to confirm the operation succeeded).

Remove the standalone 'Known Pitfalls' section or fold it into the per-workflow Pitfalls blocks to eliminate duplication.

Consider whether the Quick Reference table adds enough beyond the workflow sections, or trim it to only non-obvious mappings.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly useful and not over-explaining known concepts, but the per-workflow 'Pitfalls' blocks are restated in a global 'Known Pitfalls' section and the Quick Reference table re-lists the same workflows, adding redundancy.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete tool slugs (e.g., MIRO_GET_BOARDS2, MIRO_CREATE_STICKY_NOTE_ITEM), explicit parameter objects (data, style, position, geometry), and ordered sequences give mostly executable guidance with only minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sequences are listed and Setup includes an ACTIVE-status checkpoint, but batch (MIRO_CREATE_ITEMS_IN_BULK) and outward-sharing operations lack verification steps, capping workflow clarity at 3 per the destructive/batch guideline.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained file with clear section headers and no nested references; organization is good but the duplicated pitfalls/table content keeps it from fully lean.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinctive, clearly scoping Miro automation, but it omits any explicit 'Use when...' trigger guidance, which limits completeness. Trigger-term coverage is strong but could add the 'whiteboard' synonym.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause naming concrete triggers (e.g., 'Use when the user asks to create or edit Miro whiteboards, sticky notes, or frames').

Include the synonym 'whiteboard' alongside 'boards' to broaden natural trigger matching.

Tie each listed object (boards, items, sticky notes, frames, sharing, connectors) to an explicit verb to strengthen specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several specific capabilities — 'boards, items, sticky notes, frames, sharing, connectors' — giving broad coverage, though the only action verb is 'Automate' with the rest implied per object.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (automate Miro board/item operations) but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, so completeness is capped at 3 per the rubric guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms users would say are present ('Miro', 'boards', 'sticky notes', 'frames', 'sharing', 'connectors'), but the common synonym 'whiteboard' and a few variations are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Miro' is a clear, narrowly-scoped niche with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
davepoon/buildwithclaude
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.