render-automation
Automate Render tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): services, deployments, projects. Always search tools first for current schemas.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:davepoon/buildwithclaude --skill render-automation60
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
40%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description identifies a clear, specific integration (Render via Rube MCP/Composio) which provides good distinctiveness, but lacks concrete action verbs and explicit trigger guidance. The 'what' is partially addressed through domain naming, but the 'when' is entirely missing, significantly limiting Claude's ability to know when to select this skill.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause specifying trigger scenarios like 'Use when the user asks about Render deployments, managing web services on Render, or Composio integrations'
Replace noun list 'services, deployments, projects' with concrete action verbs like 'create services, trigger deployments, manage projects, check deployment status'
Include natural user terms like 'deploy', 'hosting', 'web app', 'cloud service' that users might say when needing this skill
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Render tasks via Rube MCP/Composio) and lists some actions (services, deployments, projects), but these are nouns rather than concrete verbs describing what actions can be performed on them. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Describes what it does (automate Render tasks) but lacks any explicit 'Use when...' clause or trigger guidance. The instruction to 'search tools first' is operational guidance, not usage triggers. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant keywords like 'Render', 'services', 'deployments', 'projects', 'Composio', and 'MCP', but missing common variations users might say like 'deploy', 'hosting', 'web service', or 'cloud deployment'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche targeting Render platform via Rube MCP/Composio integration. The combination of 'Render', 'Rube MCP', and 'Composio' creates a distinct trigger profile unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides solid workflow guidance with clear sequencing and validation checkpoints for Render automation tasks. However, it lacks executable code examples (only pseudocode patterns), contains some redundancy in pitfall documentation, and could benefit from splitting detailed reference material into separate files. The structure is good but actionability suffers from abstract rather than copy-paste-ready examples.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable tool call examples with actual parameter values (e.g., show a complete RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS call with expected response structure)
Consolidate repeated pitfalls (service ID format, pagination behavior) into a single 'Reference' section to reduce redundancy
Convert pseudocode patterns in 'Common Patterns' section to actual code or tool invocation examples that can be directly used
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably efficient but includes some redundancy - pitfalls are repeated across sections (e.g., service ID format mentioned multiple times), and some explanations like 'Projects group related services together' state the obvious. The quick reference table at the end duplicates information already covered. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides clear tool sequences and parameter lists, but lacks executable code examples. The 'Common Patterns' section uses pseudocode-style numbered steps rather than actual API calls or code snippets. Key parameters are listed but without concrete example values showing complete tool invocations. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced with explicit steps marked as [Required], [Prerequisite], or [Optional]. The 'Deploy and Monitor Pattern' includes a clear feedback loop with terminal state checking. Setup section has numbered verification steps. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized with clear sections, but everything is in a single file that runs ~150 lines. The detailed pitfalls and patterns could be split into separate reference files. Links to external Composio docs are provided but no internal file references for advanced topics. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.