Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and highly actionable with concrete EARS patterns, examples, templates, and well-organized progressive disclosure to real reference files. Its main weaknesses are mild verbosity (marketing language, an attribution paragraph, and some restated content) and the absence of an explicit validation/feedback checkpoint in the workflow.
Suggestions
Tighten conciseness: drop the 'Rolls-Royce methodology' flourish and the methodology-inspired-by attribution, and avoid restating the description's triggers in the 'When to Use' section — reference it instead.
Add an explicit validation/verification step to the workflow (e.g., a Step 5.5 'Review the enhanced prompt against the transformation checklist and quality criteria; revise any EARS statements that are non-atomic or lack measurable criteria') to create a clear feedback loop.
De-duplicate the Resources section so it only states when to load each file, since each reference's purpose is already described at its inline citation in Steps 2, 3, and Advanced Techniques.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and actionable, but includes tightening opportunities: the marketing phrase 'a Rolls-Royce methodology', the methodology-inspired-by attribution paragraph, and redundancy where 'When to Use' restates triggers already in the description and the Resources section restates reference purposes already given inline at Steps 2, 3, and Advanced Techniques. Not the top anchor because not every token earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: the five EARS patterns with a before/after reminder-app example, a transformation checklist, domain-to-theory mappings, a full Role/Skills/Workflows/Examples/Formats output template, and explicit quality criteria. This matches the 'specific examples; copy-paste ready' anchor for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step optimization workflow is clearly sequenced and includes embedded checklists (transformation checklist, do's/don'ts, quality criteria), but there is no explicit validation/verification gate or feedback loop — checkpoints are implicit via the quality criteria rather than a labeled 'validate, then proceed' step. This matches the 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit' anchor rather than the explicit-feedback-loop anchor above. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview pointing to four real, one-level-deep reference files (ears_syntax.md, domain_theories.md, examples.md, advanced_techniques.md — all present in references/), signaled inline at the relevant steps and consolidated in a Resources section with 'When to load references' guidance, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |