Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An honestly-framed routing/reference skill that is well-structured and concise, but its actionability is limited because it cannot provide executable v2 code and only points at low-level files to inspect.
Suggestions
Add a minimal, explicitly-prototype raw WebSocket code sketch using the named hooks (websocket.go, live-version.go) so the v2 fallback is actionable rather than only descriptive.
De-duplicate the low-level file paths by listing them once in the API reference section and referencing that list from Quick start and Key parameters.
Show one concrete snippet of how to override client host/version/path from the shared client options, since that is the actual integration mechanism.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence (no explanations of what STT or Deepgram is), but the low-level file paths are repeated across Quick start, Key parameters, and API reference, adding minor redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Points to specific files and an alternative skill, but provides no executable recipe for the raw WebSocket v2 fallback itself; guidance is concrete but incomplete for the core task. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The routing decision flow (v1 acceptable → speech-to-type skill; voice-agent → voice-agent skill; must do v2 → listed raw hooks) is clear and unambiguous, though not a sequenced multi-step workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with one-level-deep references (in-repo source files and external URLs) clearly signaled in the layered API reference; no nested reference chains and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |