Submit expense reimbursements through Benepass (app.getbenepass.com). For users whose employer uses Benepass as their benefits platform. Handles login, benefit selection, form filling, receipt upload, and submission. Requires browser/computer-use capabilities.
90
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Risky
Do not use without reviewing
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly identifies the specific platform (Benepass), lists concrete actions in the workflow, specifies when it should be used, and includes natural trigger terms. The description is concise yet comprehensive, and the mention of browser/computer-use requirements adds useful context for skill selection.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: login, benefit selection, form filling, receipt upload, and submission. Also specifies the platform (Benepass) and its URL. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (submit expense reimbursements through Benepass with specific steps) and 'when' (for users whose employer uses Benepass as their benefits platform). Also notes a prerequisite (browser/computer-use capabilities). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'expense reimbursements', 'Benepass', 'receipt upload', 'benefits platform', 'submission'. The domain URL (app.getbenepass.com) is also a useful trigger. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive — targets a specific platform (Benepass) with a specific URL and a specific workflow (expense reimbursement). Very unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong browser-automation skill with highly actionable, domain-specific guidance that Claude wouldn't know otherwise (hidden file inputs, verification code flows, UI quirks). The workflow is clearly sequenced with good validation checkpoints and error recovery. Minor weaknesses include some redundancy (expired code handling duplicated) and the content being entirely inline without progressive disclosure to supporting files.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated expired verification code instructions — keep it in either Step 2b or Troubleshooting, not both.
Consider extracting the Troubleshooting section into a separate TROUBLESHOOTING.md file to keep the main skill leaner and improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient with domain-specific details Claude wouldn't know (hidden file input, verification code flow, amount field quirk), but includes some unnecessary verbosity like 'Optional but recommended' explanations and repeated instructions (expired code handling appears in both Step 2 and Troubleshooting). | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides highly specific, concrete guidance throughout: exact URLs, Gmail search queries, specific element IDs (`fileInput`), exact tool invocations (`upload_file`), UI element descriptions, and precise interaction patterns (triple-click to select). This is browser-automation guidance that is as executable as it can be without traditional code. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 7-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints at critical points: verify login success (Step 2c), verify upload success (Step 6 item 4), present summary for confirmation before submit (Step 7), and verify submission success. Includes feedback loops for expired codes and failed uploads in the troubleshooting section. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear headers and sub-steps, but it's a monolithic document with no references to external files. The troubleshooting section and some detailed sub-steps could be split out, though for a skill of this length (~150 lines) it's borderline acceptable as a single file. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
b27906e
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.