api-documentation-generator
Generate comprehensive, developer-friendly API documentation from code, including endpoints, parameters, examples, and best practices
55
Quality
47%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./docs/v19.7/configuration/agent/skills_external/antigravity-awesome-skills-main/skills/api-documentation-generator/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description effectively communicates specific capabilities for API documentation generation with concrete deliverables (endpoints, parameters, examples, best practices). However, it lacks explicit trigger guidance ('Use when...') and could benefit from additional natural keywords users might employ when requesting this functionality.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger scenarios like 'when the user asks to document an API, generate API docs, or create endpoint documentation'
Include common keyword variations users might say: 'docs', 'swagger', 'OpenAPI', 'REST API', 'API reference', '.yaml', '.json'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Generate comprehensive, developer-friendly API documentation from code, including endpoints, parameters, examples, and best practices' - covers documentation generation with specific deliverables. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers 'what' (generate API documentation with specific components) but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause or trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Contains relevant keywords like 'API documentation', 'endpoints', 'parameters', but missing common variations users might say like 'docs', 'swagger', 'OpenAPI', 'REST API', or file extensions. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused specifically on API documentation generation from code - distinct from general documentation skills or code generation skills, with specific domain markers like 'endpoints' and 'parameters'. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
27%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is excessively verbose, explaining concepts Claude already understands while providing documentation templates rather than actionable generation tools. The content would benefit from dramatic reduction (80%+), splitting examples into separate files, and adding actual code/commands for generating documentation from codebases rather than just showing what good documentation looks like.
Suggestions
Reduce content to under 100 lines by removing explanations of basic concepts (REST, authentication, HTTP methods) and focusing only on project-specific patterns or tools
Add executable code for documentation generation (e.g., scripts to extract docstrings, parse route decorators, or generate OpenAPI specs from code)
Split the extensive examples (REST, GraphQL, Auth) into separate reference files (e.g., EXAMPLES.md, OPENAPI-TEMPLATE.md) with clear links from the main skill
Add explicit validation steps to the workflow, such as 'Run API tests against generated docs' or 'Verify example requests return expected responses'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose with extensive explanations Claude already knows (what REST APIs are, what authentication is, basic HTTP concepts). The document is over 400 lines when the core actionable content could be conveyed in under 100 lines. Includes redundant sections like 'When to Use This Skill' and 'How It Works' that describe obvious concepts. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete examples of documentation output formats (REST, GraphQL, OpenAPI snippets), but lacks executable code for actually generating documentation. The skill describes what good documentation looks like rather than providing tools/commands to generate it. Examples are output templates, not generation scripts. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-5 outline a process but lack validation checkpoints or feedback loops. No verification steps to confirm documentation accuracy against actual API behavior. The 'Common Pitfalls' section mentions testing examples but doesn't integrate this into the workflow as an explicit validation step. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Monolithic wall of text with everything inline. The 'Related Skills' and 'Additional Resources' sections reference external content, but the main body contains extensive examples, best practices, pitfalls, and tools that should be split into separate reference files. No clear navigation structure for a document this size. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- duclm1x1/Dive-Ai
- Commit
20ba150
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.