Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and actionable with executable commands and a clear numbered process, but it is somewhat padded by a full output template and example prompts, and its workflow lacks explicit validation checkpoints. Tightening the template and adding a validate-and-retry step around evidence gathering would lift the weaker dimensions.
Suggestions
Trim or condense the full Output Format markdown template and the example-prompt blockquotes; reference the structure briefly rather than reproducing an entire copy-paste block.
Add an explicit validation/feedback checkpoint to the workflow — e.g., after gathering evidence, verify the 2-3 datapoint threshold is met before recommending, and loop back to search if not.
Consider moving the worked terminal-recording example into a separate reference file to keep the main body as a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and action-oriented with no concept-explanation fluff, but the full copy-paste Output Format template and example-prompt blockquotes are padding Claude could generate itself; could be tightened. Not level 3 because not every token earns its place, and not level 1 because there is no generic background explanation. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands (git clone, cat README, mkdir -p ./scratch/research) and a concrete worked search-query example, matching the copy-paste-ready anchor. Not level 2 because the code is real and complete rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-5 are clearly sequenced, but validation checkpoints are implicit (the "Minimum 2-3 datapoints" gate is stated but has no validate-fix-retry loop). Not level 3 because explicit validation/feedback steps are missing; not level 1 because the sequence is clear and present. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body references none; the skill is a single well-organized file with clean section headers and easy navigation, which satisfies the simple-skill carve-out for a top score. Not level 2 because nothing that should be split is inlined and organization is clean. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |