Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, security-conscious setup skill: the check-before-asking workflow, explicit validation loops with error recovery, and exact user-facing scripts make it highly actionable. Its only weaknesses are minor: a thrice-repeated secret-handling reminder and validation calls written as HTTP text rather than runnable commands.
Suggestions
State the 'never paste or echo the key into chat' rule once (e.g., in Safety Rules) instead of repeating it in Steps 0, 1, and 2, to tighten conciseness.
Express the two validation requests as copy-paste-ready curl commands (e.g., `curl -s -H "xi-api-key: $ELEVENLABS_API_KEY" https://api.elevenlabs.io/v1/user`) so the checks are directly executable rather than described as HTTP shapes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no explanation of what an API key or .env file is, just URLs, an exact env line, and HTTP calls. The "do not paste/share the key into chat" instruction is repeated three times (Steps 0, 1, and 2) and could be trimmed to one stated rule. Not 5 because of that redundancy; not 3 because there is no over-explanation or padding beyond it. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete throughout: exact portal URL (https://elevenlabs.io/app/settings/api-keys), the exact .env line, and two validation HTTP requests with the xi-api-key header and failure/success branches. Not 5 because the HTTP checks are shown as text blocks rather than copy-paste-ready curl commands, leaving a minor executable gap; not 3 because every step specifies exactly what to do and say, with no pseudocode. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-2 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (validate existing key before setup; validate the .env key after save) and full feedback loops: on validation failure the skill reports the failure, re-shows the expected state, and asks the user to replace and retry. Not 4 because both checkpoints are explicit, not implicit, and error recovery is spelled out rather than merely suggested. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-purpose, instruction-only skill with no bundle files and no content that belongs in external references; the body is organized into a Workflow (Steps 0-2) and Safety Rules with clear headers, matching the simple-skill exception where well-organized sections alone satisfy progressive disclosure. Not 4 because there are no organization gaps or misplaced bulk content to point to. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |