Explains ev-node architecture, components, and internal workings. Use when the user asks how ev-node works, wants to understand the block package, DA layer, sequencing, namespaces, or needs architecture explanations. Covers block production, syncing, DA submission, forced inclusion, single vs based sequencer, and censorship resistance.
86
81%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
91%
1.56xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its scope around ev-node architecture, provides explicit 'Use when' guidance with natural trigger terms, and covers a comprehensive list of specific topics. The description is concise, uses third person voice, and is highly distinctive due to its domain-specific terminology.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and topics: block production, syncing, DA submission, forced inclusion, single vs based sequencer, censorship resistance, block package, DA layer, sequencing, namespaces. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Explains ev-node architecture, components, and internal workings') and when ('Use when the user asks how ev-node works, wants to understand the block package, DA layer, sequencing, namespaces, or needs architecture explanations') with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'how ev-node works', 'block package', 'DA layer', 'sequencing', 'namespaces', 'architecture', 'block production', 'syncing', 'forced inclusion', 'censorship resistance'. Good coverage of domain-specific terms a user would naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly specific to ev-node architecture with distinct domain-specific triggers like 'ev-node', 'DA submission', 'forced inclusion', 'based sequencer', and 'censorship resistance'. Very unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid architecture explainer skill with clear structure, good use of tables and ASCII diagrams, and well-organized sections covering all major components. Its main weaknesses are moderate verbosity (some content could be offloaded to referenced files) and limited actionability since it's purely explanatory rather than task-oriented. The workflow clarity is strong with well-sequenced processes and error handling paths.
Suggestions
Trim the main SKILL.md to a concise overview and move detailed interface definitions, key file tables, and status code lists into the referenced bundle files (block-architecture.md, da-sequencing.md) to improve progressive disclosure.
Add the actual bundle files (block-architecture.md, da-sequencing.md) so the referenced paths are valid and the content is properly distributed across files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Generally efficient with good use of tables and diagrams, but some sections are slightly verbose (e.g., 'The DA layer abstracts blob storage. ev-node uses Celestia but the interface is pluggable.' is somewhat redundant given the interface is shown). The 'Core Principles' section and some prose could be tightened, though overall it respects Claude's intelligence reasonably well. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete Go interface definitions, file paths, and ASCII diagrams which are useful for understanding architecture. However, this is an explanatory/reference skill rather than a task-execution skill, so there are no executable commands or step-by-step instructions to follow. The guidance is specific (file paths, type definitions, status codes) but not copy-paste actionable in the traditional sense. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes like block production, syncing, DA submission failure handling, and crash recovery are clearly sequenced with explicit steps. The ASCII flow diagrams effectively communicate component interactions. The forced inclusion flow has a clear numbered sequence with conditions. For an architecture explainer skill, the workflows are well-articulated. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to block-architecture.md and da-sequencing.md are well-signaled and one level deep, which is good. However, since no bundle files are provided, we cannot verify these references exist. The SKILL.md itself is quite long (~200 lines) and some content (like detailed key files tables and interface definitions) could potentially be offloaded to the referenced files, keeping the main file as a leaner overview. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
27eeb48
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.