Explains ev-node architecture, components, and internal workings. Use when the user asks how ev-node works, wants to understand the block package, DA layer, sequencing, namespaces, or needs architecture explanations. Covers block production, syncing, DA submission, forced inclusion, single vs based sequencer, and censorship resistance.
93
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that follows best practices. It uses third person voice, provides specific technical capabilities, includes an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms, and targets a clear niche (ev-node architecture) that minimizes conflict with other skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and concepts: 'block package, DA layer, sequencing, namespaces, block production, syncing, DA submission, forced inclusion, single vs based sequencer, and censorship resistance.' These are specific technical components rather than vague abstractions. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Explains ev-node architecture, components, and internal workings') and when ('Use when the user asks how ev-node works, wants to understand the block package, DA layer, sequencing, namespaces, or needs architecture explanations'). Has explicit 'Use when...' clause with specific triggers. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'how ev-node works', 'architecture explanations', 'block package', 'DA layer', 'sequencing', 'namespaces', 'block production', 'syncing', 'forced inclusion', 'censorship resistance'. Good coverage of domain-specific terms a user asking about ev-node would naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with clear niche around 'ev-node' specifically. The technical terms (DA layer, forced inclusion, based sequencer) are specific to this domain and unlikely to conflict with generic coding or documentation skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured architecture explainer that efficiently conveys complex system design through tables, diagrams, and clear hierarchical organization. It excels at progressive disclosure and workflow clarity, appropriately deferring deep dives to linked files. The main weakness is limited actionability - while appropriate for an explainer skill, it could benefit from a few concrete debugging or exploration commands.
Suggestions
Add 1-2 concrete commands for exploring the codebase (e.g., grep patterns to find key interfaces, or how to trace a block through the system)
Include a brief example of how to instantiate components for testing or debugging purposes
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, using tables and diagrams to convey information densely. It assumes Claude understands Go interfaces, rollup concepts, and doesn't waste tokens explaining basic concepts like what a DA layer is. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill is explanatory rather than instructional, which is appropriate for an architecture explainer. However, it provides concrete interface definitions and file locations, but lacks executable examples or specific commands for common tasks like debugging or tracing flows. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes like block production and syncing are clearly sequenced with ASCII diagrams showing flow. The FAQ section addresses common scenarios with clear step-by-step explanations including error handling (DA submission failures, crash recovery). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent structure with clear overview, well-organized tables, and explicit one-level-deep references to detailed files (block-architecture.md, da-sequencing.md). Content is appropriately split between overview and deep-dive materials. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.