Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent, lean skill body: actionable code and commands, clearly sequenced workflows with verification, and well-organized sections that need no external bundle files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and well-organized with tables, short sections, and code examples; it assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining what feature flags or basic concepts are, with code comments earning their place by clarifying skipped-vs-failed behavior. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance: real pragmas (`@gate enableViewTransition`), real commands (`/flags --diff <channel1> <channel2>`, `/test www variant false <pattern>`), and specific file paths for adding flags. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Both "Adding a New Flag" and "Debugging Channel-Specific Failures" are clearly numbered sequences, the debugging flow ends with a verification step ("Verify flag exists in all fork files"), and "Common Mistakes" acts as a checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A compact, self-contained skill with no bundle files, organized into clear single-level sections and one well-signaled cross-skill pointer ("See the `flags` skill"), with no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |