Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, largely actionable documentation skill with clear structure, a decision-level framework, and appropriate external references. Its main weakness is conciseness — several sections restate knowledge Claude already has and could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Tighten the 'Código Limpo: Zero Comentários' section — it restates basic commenting principles Claude already knows; reduce to the project-specific exceptions only and drop the general rationale.
Shorten the 'Verificação geométrica' prose to the actionable checklist bullets; the surrounding explanation of why visual review fails is background Claude does not need spelled out.
Cut the philosophical opener ('Documentação existe para responder perguntas antes que alguém precise fazer a pergunta') or fold it into the first concrete section to save tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient project-specific guidance, but several sections re-explain knowledge Claude already has — the philosophical opener ('Documentação existe para responder perguntas...'), the 'Código Limpo: Zero Comentários' section restating basic commenting philosophy, and the lengthy diagram geometric-verification prose — so it lands at 'mostly efficient with some unnecessary explanation' rather than lean. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and specific for an instruction-only skill: an exact directory tree, per-level mandatory-content checklists, and explicit rules ('Documente PADRÕES, não JSX', 'API é contrato'), with templates offloaded to real referenced files; the gap is the absence of a worked example doc. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence exists via the 'Quando Documentar' timeline and per-level mandatory-content lists acting as inline checklists, with 'Evidência de Conclusão' serving as a validation checkpoint before handoff; minor validation gaps remain as no explicit validate-then-proceed loop is spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good section structure with well-signaled, one-level-deep references (templates deferred to docs/skill-guides/documenter-templates.md and templates/doc-update.md 'apenas quando necessário'); the inlined diagram section and full directory tree are minor organization gaps rather than separate files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |