Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable review-gate playbook with clear workflow sequencing, validation checkpoints, and good progressive disclosure. The main flaw is a duplicated section that hurts token efficiency.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated 'Constituicao como rubric primario' block (lines 44-51 are a verbatim repeat of 35-42) to recover token budget.
Sharpen distinctiveness by narrowing the 'reviewer'/'review final' triggers or scoping them to the final-deploy-gate context to avoid collision with the code-reviewer subagent.
Consider moving the full anti-rationalization table to a referenced policy file and keeping only a one-line pointer, since policies/anti-rationalization.md is already cited.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The checklists are mostly efficient, but the entire 'Constituicao como rubric primario' section is duplicated verbatim (appearing twice), which is unnecessary padding that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout — checklists with exact thresholds ('npm audit sem HIGH/CRITICAL', 'Cobertura >= 80%', 'Nenhum any no TypeScript') and a rejection workflow that mandates skill, file/line, and problem classification. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Fluxo de Review has an explicit OK/FAIL approval gate, a rejection feedback loop (rejeita → Orquestrador → skill corrige → volta), a 3-cycle cap, and pre-approval risk-banding scrutiny — clear sequence with validation checkpoints and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | An overview playbook that points to well-signaled, one-level-deep references (templates/review.md, templates/rejection.md, policies/*.md, personas/code-reviewer.md) with no nested reference chains; inline checklists are the operational core that belongs in SKILL.md. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |