Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction-only skill with concrete, actionable rules and a clear workflow. The only marginal improvement is trimming a few redundant illustrative examples to tighten conciseness.
Suggestions
Trim a few redundant illustrative examples (e.g., the 'I think maybe' hedging list) since the governing rules already convey the intent, to lift conciseness from 4 to 5.
Consider consolidating the 'Common Phrases and Patterns' list into prose or numbered form to match the skill's own anti-bullet-list guidance and save tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and efficient, assuming Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, but a few illustrative examples (e.g., the 'I think maybe' anti-patterns) are slightly redundant with their governing rules. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete and executable guidance: exact prohibited phrases, heading-level limits, specific opening/closing sentence patterns, and a precise markdown output spec with language identifiers. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow from 'Before Writing' (ask the user) through drafting to 'Output Format', with an explicit checkpoint ('If the user has already provided this information, proceed directly to writing'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single-purpose skill with no external references needed and well-organized h2 sections that make navigation easy; absence of bundle files is appropriate here. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |