Write copy following Sentry brand guidelines. Use when writing UI text, error messages, empty states, onboarding flows, 404 pages, documentation, marketing copy, or any user-facing content. Covers both Plain Speech (default) and Sentry Voice tones.
97
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
98%
1.06xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly communicates its purpose, scope, and trigger conditions. It names the specific brand (Sentry), lists concrete content types it covers, includes an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms, and mentions the two specific tone modes. The description is concise yet comprehensive, making it easy for Claude to select appropriately.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and content types: UI text, error messages, empty states, onboarding flows, 404 pages, documentation, marketing copy. Also specifies two tone modes (Plain Speech and Sentry Voice). | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (write copy following Sentry brand guidelines, covering Plain Speech and Sentry Voice tones) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause listing specific trigger scenarios like UI text, error messages, empty states, etc.). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes a strong set of natural keywords users would actually say: 'UI text', 'error messages', 'empty states', 'onboarding flows', '404 pages', 'documentation', 'marketing copy', 'user-facing content', 'brand guidelines', 'copy'. These cover a wide range of common user requests. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive due to the specific brand name 'Sentry' and the specific tone names 'Plain Speech' and 'Sentry Voice'. This is clearly a brand-specific copywriting skill that would not easily conflict with generic writing or other brand skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, well-crafted brand guidelines skill that provides highly actionable guidance through concrete examples and clear decision tables. The tone selection table at the top is an excellent decision-making tool. The main weakness is that the content is somewhat long for a single file and could benefit from splitting detailed UI element guidelines into a separate reference document.
Suggestions
Consider moving the 'UI Element Guidelines' and 'Anti-Patterns' sections into a separate reference file (e.g., UI_PATTERNS.md) and linking to it from the main skill to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and well-structured with tables and examples that earn their place. It doesn't explain obvious concepts and assumes Claude understands writing, focusing only on Sentry-specific guidelines. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete before/after examples, specific rules for each UI element type, and clear patterns to follow. The tables of 'Avoid/Prefer' and 'Instead of/Write' give directly usable guidance for copy generation. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For a writing/style guide skill, the workflow is clear: determine context via the tone selection table, apply the appropriate tone's rules, and follow general rules. Error message construction has a clear 3-step sequence. This is a single-task skill where the decision flow is unambiguous. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear sections and headers, but it's somewhat long for a SKILL.md. The UI Element Guidelines and Anti-Patterns sections could be split into separate reference files. The two external references at the end are good but the inline content is heavy. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
51b0238
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.