CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

recipe-review-meet-participants

Review who attended a Google Meet conference and for how long.

70

Quality

63%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/recipe-review-meet-participants/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

40%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear and distinct niche (Google Meet attendance review) but is too brief and lacks explicit trigger guidance. It would benefit from listing more specific capabilities and adding a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms users might say.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks about Google Meet attendance, participant lists, meeting duration, or who joined a video call.'

Expand the capability list with more specific actions, e.g., 'Review who attended a Google Meet conference, check participant join/leave times, calculate total attendance duration, and summarize meeting participation.'

Include additional natural trigger terms like 'meeting participants', 'video call attendance', 'call duration', 'who was on the call'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (Google Meet) and a specific action (review attendance and duration), but only describes one capability rather than listing multiple concrete actions.

2 / 3

Completeness

Describes what the skill does but has no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 2, and the 'what' is also fairly thin, bringing it closer to 1.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes 'Google Meet' and 'attended' as natural keywords, but misses common variations like 'meeting attendance', 'participants', 'call duration', 'video call', or 'conference call'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of 'Google Meet' attendance review is a very specific niche that is unlikely to conflict with other skills; it clearly targets a distinct use case.

3 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Implementation

87%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted, concise skill that provides clear, actionable CLI commands in a logical sequence. It respects Claude's intelligence by not over-explaining concepts. The only minor weakness is the lack of guidance on interpreting results or handling edge cases (e.g., no conferences found), though this is mitigated by the read-only nature of the operations.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Very lean and efficient. No unnecessary explanations of what Google Meet is or how conferences work. Every line serves a purpose.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides specific, copy-paste ready CLI commands with exact syntax, parameter formats, and placeholder values clearly indicated (CONFERENCE_ID, PARTICIPANT_ID).

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps are clearly sequenced and logically ordered (list conferences → list participants → get sessions), but there's no validation or error handling guidance. For a read-only operation this is less critical, but guidance on what to do if no conferences are found or how to interpret the output would improve clarity.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

For a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines, the content is well-organized with a clear prerequisite callout and numbered steps. No need for external references given the scope.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
googleworkspace/cli
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.