Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured debugging methodology with strong workflow sequencing, explicit validation, and feedback loops. It is instruction-only but actionable, with only minor redundancy and a couple of unexplained references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — short XML-tagged sections, numbered lists, no padding about what debugging is — with only minor redundancy (best_practices/pitfalls restate phase-1 steps); not a 5 because the checklist and pitfalls overlap content already covered. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete instructions like 'git diff, new dependencies, config changes', 'add diagnostic logging at each boundary', and 'create a failing test that reproduces the bug' give mostly executable guidance; not a 5 because 'OODA' is referenced without explanation and no concrete hypothesis example beyond the template. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four sequential phases with 'Execute phases sequentially', explicit validation ('Verify: test passes, no regressions, issue resolved'), feedback loops ('If it fails, form a new hypothesis', 'If 3+ fixes have failed: stop'), and a validation_checklist match the clear-sequence-with-validation-and-feedback anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (role, when_to_use, four phases, checklist, best_practices, pitfalls) with no nested references and no bulky inlined material that belongs elsewhere; not a 5 because the simple-skill 5 exception targets sub-50-line skills and this runs ~97 lines as a single monolithic file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |