Vue/TypeScriptの実装に関するAgent
46
32%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.claude/skills/vue-skill/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
22%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is severely underdeveloped, providing only a technology stack mention without any concrete capabilities or usage triggers. It fails to explain what specific tasks the skill performs (component creation, state management, testing, etc.) and provides no guidance on when Claude should select this skill over others.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Creates Vue 3 components with TypeScript, implements Composition API patterns, configures Vuex/Pinia stores'
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with trigger terms like 'Vue component', 'TypeScript setup', '.vue files', 'Composition API', 'Vue router'
Include common file extensions and framework-specific terminology users would mention, such as '.vue', 'SFC', 'script setup', 'defineProps'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description only mentions 'Vue/TypeScript implementation' without any concrete actions. It uses vague language ('Agent') and doesn't specify what operations it performs. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | Only vaguely addresses 'what' (implementation-related) and completely lacks any 'when' clause or explicit trigger guidance. No 'Use when...' or equivalent is present. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Contains relevant technology keywords 'Vue' and 'TypeScript' that users might naturally mention, but lacks common variations like '.vue files', 'components', 'composition API', or specific implementation tasks. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Vue/TypeScript is somewhat specific as a technology combination, but 'implementation' is too broad and could overlap with general coding skills, frontend skills, or JavaScript-related skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
42%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides highly actionable Vue 3/TypeScript guidance with excellent code examples and clear patterns, but suffers from severe verbosity and poor progressive disclosure. The content explains many concepts Claude already understands and could be reduced by 60-70% while maintaining the same instructional value. The checklist approach is good but would benefit from validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Reduce content by 60%+ by removing explanations of concepts Claude knows (what Composition API is, basic TypeScript, what Atomic Design means) and keeping only project-specific patterns and code examples
Split into multiple files: SKILL.md (overview + quick reference), PATTERNS.md (detailed code patterns), TESTING.md (test strategies), MIGRATION.md (React-to-Vue conversion)
Add explicit validation steps to workflows, e.g., 'After creating composable: 1. Run type check 2. Verify single responsibility 3. Test in isolation'
Convert the verbose Bad/Good examples into a concise reference table format that shows the pattern without lengthy explanations
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The document is extremely verbose at 600+ lines, explaining many concepts Claude already knows (what Composition API is, basic TypeScript patterns, what Atomic Design is). Contains excessive repetition of principles and redundant examples that could be condensed significantly. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable code examples throughout, with clear copy-paste ready snippets for Vue 3 patterns, composables, type definitions, and testing. The React-to-Vue migration table and conversion examples are concrete and immediately usable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Contains a comprehensive checklist at the end covering design, implementation, and testing stages, but lacks explicit validation checkpoints within workflows. The multi-step processes (like component creation) don't have clear feedback loops or verification steps. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The document is a monolithic wall of text with no references to external files for detailed content. The table of contents exists but all content is inline. Advanced topics like testing strategies and type patterns could be split into separate reference files. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
skill_md_line_count | SKILL.md is long (1026 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
b4ee987
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.