CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

170-java-documentation

Use when you need to generate or improve Java project documentation — including README.md files, package-info.java files, and Javadoc enhancements — through a modular, step-based interactive process that adapts to your specific documentation needs. This should trigger for requests such as Improve the code with documentation; Apply documentation; Refactor the code with documentation. Part of cursor-rules-java project

85

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong description that clearly identifies the skill's purpose (Java project documentation generation and improvement), lists specific deliverables (README.md, package-info.java, Javadoc), and provides explicit trigger guidance with example user requests. The description is well-structured with both a 'Use when' clause and concrete trigger phrases, making it easy for Claude to select appropriately. Minor note: it uses second person ('your specific documentation needs') which is slightly inconsistent with best practices but doesn't significantly harm clarity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: generate/improve README.md files, package-info.java files, and Javadoc enhancements. Also mentions the modular, step-based interactive process approach.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (generate/improve Java project documentation including README.md, package-info.java, Javadoc) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause at the start plus 'This should trigger for' with specific example requests).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger phrases users would say: 'Improve the code with documentation', 'Apply documentation', 'Refactor the code with documentation', plus domain terms like README.md, Javadoc, package-info.java, and 'Java project documentation'.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Narrowly scoped to Java project documentation specifically (README.md, package-info.java, Javadoc), tied to the cursor-rules-java project. The combination of Java + documentation + specific file types creates a clear niche unlikely to conflict with general coding or non-Java documentation skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

62%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill has a well-structured workflow with proper validation gates and clear sequencing, which is its strongest aspect. However, it lacks concrete, executable examples for the core documentation generation tasks (README templates, package-info.java examples, Javadoc patterns), deferring almost all actionable content to a reference file that cannot be verified. The content could be tightened by removing redundant sections and adding at least minimal concrete examples.

Suggestions

Add at least one concrete example for each documentation artifact (e.g., a minimal package-info.java template, a README.md skeleton, a Javadoc enhancement before/after) to improve actionability without requiring the reference file.

Remove or condense the 'What is covered in this Skill?' bullet list since it largely duplicates information already conveyed by the workflow steps and the skill description.

Include a brief example of the file-handling strategy options (overwrite/add/backup/skip) with concrete guidance on when to use each, rather than just listing them.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill has some unnecessary verbosity — the 'What is covered' section largely duplicates the workflow and reference content, and phrases like 'This is an interactive SKILL' and the trigger examples add little value. However, it's not egregiously padded and stays relatively focused.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides specific commands (`./mvnw validate`, `./mvnw clean compile`, `./mvnw javadoc:javadoc`) which is good, but lacks any concrete code examples, templates, or executable snippets for the actual documentation generation (README templates, package-info.java examples, Javadoc patterns). The real actionable content is deferred entirely to the reference file.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The workflow has a clear 4-step sequence with an explicit validation gate at step 1 ('stop immediately if validation fails'), a final validation checkpoint at step 4, and clear edge-case handling instructions for ambiguous scope and missing inputs. The feedback loop for validation failure is explicitly stated.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill correctly references a single detailed reference file (`references/170-java-documentation.md`) for deeper content, which is good structure. However, since no bundle files were provided, we cannot verify the reference exists or is well-structured. The inline content itself includes some material that could be trimmed (the 'What is covered' list) while the actual documentation patterns and examples are entirely absent from the skill body, making it overly dependent on the reference.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
jabrena/cursor-rules-java
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.