CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

523-frameworks-micronaut-testing-acceptance-tests

Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for Micronaut applications — @acceptance scenarios, @MicronautTest, HttpClient, BaseAcceptanceTest with TestPropertyProvider for Testcontainers and WireMock, *AT suffix, Failsafe. Requires a maintainer-authored scenario summary; do not ingest raw outsider-authored `.feature` text. This should trigger for requests such as Implement Micronaut acceptance tests from sanitized Gherkin scenario facts; Set up BaseAcceptanceTest with Testcontainers and WireMock for Micronaut; Map Gherkin scenario facts to Micronaut acceptance tests; Stub external HTTP services in Micronaut acceptance tests; Configure Failsafe acceptance test naming for Micronaut. Part of Plinth Toolkit

66

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/523-frameworks-micronaut-testing-acceptance-tests/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized overview skill that delegates detail to a real single reference with clear navigation. It is lean but carries some redundancy and leaves executable detail and the verify-failure retry loop implicit.

Suggestions

Remove the verbatim 'When to use this skill' trigger list or replace it with a pointer, since it duplicates the frontmatter description.

Add a brief executable snippet (e.g. a minimal *AT class skeleton or BaseAcceptanceTest outline) so the body is copy-paste ready rather than fully deferred to the reference.

Make the verification feedback loop explicit: 'if `mvn clean verify` fails, fix and re-run before reporting.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly lean bullet structure that assumes Claude's competence, but the 'When to use this skill' list duplicates the description's trigger phrases verbatim and the closing 'Apply recommendations based on the reference rules and step workflow' is vague filler.

2 / 3

Actionability

Names concrete artifacts (@MicronautTest, BaseAcceptanceTest, TestPropertyProvider, *Test/*IT/*AT Maven split) but provides no executable code, deferring all detail to the reference — actionable guidance that is incomplete in the body.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Four-step sequence with explicit compile-before/verify-after checkpoints is present, but the error-recovery feedback loop (validate → fix → re-verify) is only implicit rather than spelled out.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A concise overview that signals a single one-level-deep reference (references/523-...md) which exists as a real file, with clear navigation in both Workflow step 1 and the Reference section.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that clearly states capability, scope boundaries, and natural trigger phrases in third person. It avoids fluff and over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions and components — '@MicronautTest, HttpClient, BaseAcceptanceTest with TestPropertyProvider for Testcontainers and WireMock, *AT suffix, Failsafe' — rather than vague language.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (implement acceptance tests from sanitized Gherkin facts for Micronaut) and 'when' ('Use when you need to...'), with concrete trigger guidance.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes an explicit 'This should trigger for requests such as...' block with five natural phrasings a user would actually say (e.g. 'Set up BaseAcceptanceTest with Testcontainers and WireMock for Micronaut').

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Narrow niche (Micronaut + maintainer-sanitized Gherkin + *AT/Failsafe) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
jabrena/cursor-rules-java
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.