Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and well-structured with concrete commands and validation prompts, but is held back by a duplicate numbered step, a contradictions in the resume flag guidance, and time-sensitive/marketing content that bloats the token budget.
Suggestions
Fix the duplicate step numbering: two items are both labeled '3.' (the flags list and 'Always use --skip-git-repo-check') — renumber sequentially.
Reconcile the resume-flag guidance: step 4 says flags can be inserted between exec and resume while the quick-reference table says 'no flags allowed' — state one rule clearly.
Move version-specific figures (SWE-bench percentages, v0.57.0, knowledge cutoff) and benchmark/marketing claims into a 'Version / Notes' section so the core workflow stays lean and doesn't decay.
Correct the typo 'if he species the model' to 'if the user specifies the model'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient command/flag lists, but time-sensitive figures (SWE-bench 76.3% vs 72.8%, v0.57.0, knowledge cutoff) and marketing claims ('reduced hallucinations', '30% faster') sit in the main content rather than a deprecated/version section, adding non-essential tokens. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands including the exact resume one-liner and a quick-reference table mapping use cases to flags; minor gaps come from the slightly contradictory 'no flags allowed' vs 'insert flags between exec and resume' wording. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with checkpoints (AskUserQuestion for effort level and high-impact flags, stop-on-non-zero error handling), but the duplicate '3.' step numbering and the resume-flags contradiction are real sequencing flaws. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single well-sectioned SKILL.md with no nested references and clean headers (Running a Task, Safety Boundaries, Quick Reference, Model Options); the inline model-options/marketing table is the only content that might warrant a separate reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |