Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean skill body with a clear sequenced workflow, executable example, and excellent one-level-deep reference navigation. The main gap is that only one framework is demonstrated inline while the rest are referenced.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: it assumes Claude's competence (no explaining of what mocking or coverage is) and every section — workflow, example, references table, constraints, template — earns its tokens; inline code comments only illustrate enforced patterns. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste Jest example with happy-path and error-throw cases, concrete MUST DO/MUST NOT rules, and a severity-labeled output template, but only one framework is shown in full while others are deferred to references. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step Core Workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit feedback loops (fail → classify → fix root cause → re-run; flaky → isolate → stabilize) and a verification checkpoint ('Verify coverage targets are met before closing; flag gaps explicitly'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-signaled Reference Guide table maps each topic to a real one-level-deep reference file with a 'Load When' criterion; all 10 referenced files exist in ./references/, and the body stays an overview pointing to detail. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |