CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

airflow-dag-generator

Airflow Dag Generator - Auto-activating skill for Data Pipelines. Triggers on: airflow dag generator, airflow dag generator Part of the Data Pipelines skill category.

35

0.96x
Quality

3%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

94%

0.96x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./planned-skills/generated/11-data-pipelines/airflow-dag-generator/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

7%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description is extremely thin and template-like, providing almost no useful information beyond the skill name. It lacks concrete actions, natural trigger terms, and any explicit 'when to use' guidance. It would be very difficult for Claude to confidently select this skill from a pool of available skills based on this description alone.

Suggestions

Add specific concrete actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Generates Apache Airflow DAG Python files with task dependencies, scheduling configuration, and operator definitions'.

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to create an Airflow DAG, build a data pipeline, set up workflow orchestration, or generate ETL workflows.'

Include natural keyword variations users might say: 'Airflow', 'DAG', 'data pipeline', 'ETL', 'workflow', 'task scheduling', 'Apache Airflow', '.py DAG file'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Airflow DAG') but does not describe any concrete actions. There are no specific capabilities listed like 'generates DAG files', 'configures task dependencies', or 'sets scheduling parameters'. It only says 'Auto-activating skill for Data Pipelines' which is vague.

1 / 3

Completeness

The 'what' is extremely weak — it only implies it generates Airflow DAGs without describing what that entails. The 'when' is missing entirely; there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger terms are just 'airflow dag generator' repeated twice. Missing natural variations users would say like 'create a DAG', 'data pipeline', 'Apache Airflow', 'workflow orchestration', 'ETL pipeline', 'task scheduling', or 'DAG file'.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The mention of 'Airflow DAG' does narrow the domain somewhat, making it unlikely to conflict with non-pipeline skills. However, 'Data Pipelines' is broad enough to overlap with other ETL or pipeline-related skills, and the lack of specific actions reduces distinctiveness.

2 / 3

Total

5

/

12

Passed

Implementation

0%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill is essentially a placeholder with no actionable content. It repeatedly describes itself in abstract terms without providing any actual Airflow DAG generation guidance, code examples, templates, or workflows. It fails on every dimension because it contains no substantive technical content whatsoever.

Suggestions

Add a concrete, executable Airflow DAG template (e.g., a complete Python file with DAG definition, default_args, and at least one operator) that Claude can use as a starting point.

Define a clear workflow: 1) Gather requirements (schedule, data sources, dependencies), 2) Generate DAG skeleton, 3) Add operators/tasks, 4) Validate with `python dag_file.py` to check for import errors, 5) Test with `airflow dags test`.

Include specific examples of common DAG patterns (e.g., ETL with BashOperator/PythonOperator, sensor-triggered pipelines, dynamic task generation) with copy-paste-ready code.

Remove all the meta-description sections ('When to Use', 'Example Triggers', 'Capabilities') and replace them with actual technical content—best practices for DAG design, common pitfalls, and operator selection guidance.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is entirely filler and meta-description. It explains what the skill does in abstract terms without providing any actual technical content. Every section restates the same vague information about 'airflow dag generator' without adding substance.

1 / 3

Actionability

There is zero concrete guidance—no code examples, no DAG templates, no specific Airflow operators, no commands. The skill describes rather than instructs, offering only vague promises like 'provides step-by-step guidance' without actually providing any.

1 / 3

Workflow Clarity

No workflow is defined at all. There are no steps, no sequencing, no validation checkpoints. The content merely states it can provide guidance without actually laying out any process for generating an Airflow DAG.

1 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is a flat, repetitive document with no meaningful structure. There are no references to detailed files, no layered organization, and the sections are redundant rather than progressively informative.

1 / 3

Total

4

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

9

/

11

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.