Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, actionable, and well-structured with appropriate progressive disclosure through clearly signaled reference files. The main gap is the absence of an explicit validation/review checkpoint in the workflow to confirm the contract is complete and consistent before it is shared with backend and frontend agents.
Suggestions
Add a final validation step to the Instructions (e.g., 'Before sharing, verify every endpoint documents all status codes, references shared types instead of duplicating them, and that request/response schemas match the TypeScript interfaces') to create a feedback loop.
Cross-reference the existing errors.md and examples.md bundle files in the body or Resources section — they are present but never mentioned, so a reader has no signal they exist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it does not explain REST, HTTP status codes, or TypeScript basics, and every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete numbered steps, real endpoint templates with typed request/response schemas, a TypeScript interface example, and a working pagination query-parameter table — copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six instructions are clearly sequenced, but there is no validation or verification checkpoint confirming the contract is complete and internally consistent before sharing it, capping it at 2 per the missing-feedback-loop guideline. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a concise overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to six real bundle files (writing-endpoints.md, typescript-interfaces.md, pagination.md, best-practices.md, examples.md, errors.md), each mapped to a specific purpose in the Resources section. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |