Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete code and examples, but it is token-inefficient: it duplicates a full implementation that already lives in an unlinked reference file, and lacks an explicit validation checkpoint in its workflow.
Suggestions
Replace the inlined Steps 1–4 TypeScript with a concise overview and link to references/implementation-guide.md for the full script, removing the duplication.
Add an explicit validation step before output, e.g. 'Verify the bundle is valid JSON and contains all expected sections before saving and attaching to a ticket.'
Reference the bundled implementation-guide.md (and its debug checklist / support ticket template) from the body so the existing reference is discoverable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly executable code with little concept-explanation padding, but it inlines ~140 lines of TypeScript that substantially duplicate the bundled references/implementation-guide.md, so it could be tightened by delegating to that reference. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides complete, executable TypeScript with real Apollo endpoints and copy-paste-ready curl one-liners for auth, search, and rate-limit header inspection. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–4 are clearly sequenced and the code has per-endpoint try/catch plus an error-handling table, but there is no explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoint or feedback loop confirming the bundle is well-formed before output. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A bundle file references/implementation-guide.md exists but is never linked from the body, while the full implementation is inlined (and duplicated) in SKILL.md — structure is present but the reference is unsignaled and content that should be split is inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |