benchmark-suite-creator
Benchmark Suite Creator - Auto-activating skill for Performance Testing. Triggers on: benchmark suite creator, benchmark suite creator Part of the Performance Testing skill category.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill benchmark-suite-creatorOverall
score
19%
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
Activation
7%This description is essentially a placeholder that provides almost no useful information for skill selection. It relies entirely on the skill name and category without explaining capabilities, use cases, or natural trigger terms. Claude would struggle to appropriately select this skill from a library of similar performance-related tools.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Creates benchmark test suites, measures function execution time, compares performance across implementations, generates performance reports'
Include a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms like 'Use when the user wants to benchmark code, measure performance, compare execution speeds, or create performance test suites'
Add natural keyword variations users might say: 'performance testing', 'speed test', 'execution time', 'profiling', 'load test', 'perf benchmarks'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description only names the skill ('Benchmark Suite Creator') and category ('Performance Testing') without describing any concrete actions. No specific capabilities like 'creates benchmark tests', 'measures execution time', or 'generates performance reports' are mentioned. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The description fails to answer 'what does this do' beyond the name, and provides no 'when should Claude use it' guidance. There is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | The trigger terms listed are just the skill name repeated twice ('benchmark suite creator, benchmark suite creator'). No natural user language variations like 'performance test', 'load testing', 'measure speed', or 'profiling' are included. | 1 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While 'benchmark suite' is somewhat specific to performance testing, the lack of detail about what distinguishes this from other performance-related skills (profiling, load testing, monitoring) creates potential overlap. The category mention provides some context but insufficient differentiation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 5 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
0%This skill content is essentially an empty template with no actionable information about benchmark suite creation. It contains only meta-descriptions of what the skill claims to do without any actual guidance, code examples, tool-specific instructions (k6, JMeter), or workflows. The content fails to teach Claude anything useful about performance testing or benchmark creation.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable code examples for at least one benchmarking tool (e.g., k6 or JMeter) showing how to create a basic benchmark suite
Provide a clear multi-step workflow for benchmark suite creation: define metrics → write test scenarios → configure load profiles → run benchmarks → analyze results
Include specific configuration examples and command-line invocations for running benchmarks
Remove all generic boilerplate ('provides automated assistance', 'follows best practices') and replace with actual technical content
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is padded with generic boilerplate that provides no actual information about benchmark suite creation. Phrases like 'provides automated assistance' and 'follows industry best practices' are meaningless filler that waste tokens. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | There is zero concrete guidance - no code examples, no commands, no specific steps for creating benchmark suites. The content only describes what the skill claims to do rather than instructing how to do anything. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No workflow is provided whatsoever. There are no steps, no sequence, and no validation checkpoints for creating benchmark suites despite this being a multi-step process. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is a shallow placeholder with no actual substance to organize. There are no references to detailed materials, no examples files, and no structured navigation to deeper content. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 4 / 12 Passed |
Validation
69%Validation — 11 / 16 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
description_trigger_hint | Description may be missing an explicit 'when to use' trigger hint (e.g., 'Use when...') | Warning |
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
body_steps | No step-by-step structure detected (no ordered list); consider adding a simple workflow | Warning |
Total | 11 / 16 Passed | |
Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.