Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, token-efficient production checklist with concrete code and thresholds. It loses points on workflow clarity (no explicit feedback loops) and progressive disclosure (monolithic single-file layout).
Suggestions
Add explicit feedback loops between phases, e.g. 'If the 500-row sample run yields <60% find rate, fix input quality/provider order before proceeding to Phase 3.'
Move the plan/credit comparison table and the validation/pre-flight scripts into reference files (e.g. references/credit-plans.md, scripts/preflight.sh) and link to them from the body to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a dense, task-focused checklist with no concept teaching; the TypeScript validation function, bash pre-flight, and plan table each earn their tokens rather than padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Checklist items carry concrete thresholds (100+ rows, >60% find rate, <500 credits, 50K/webhook) and the code/commands are executable and copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six phases give a clear sequence and Phase 2 adds validation gates, but there are no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops for these batch operations, which the rubric caps at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but at over 50 lines everything lives inline in one file with no bundle split; the only references are external URLs and another skill rather than one-level-deep bundle files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |