cursor-git-integration

Integrate Git workflows with Cursor IDE: AI commit messages, @Git context, diff review, and conflict resolution. Triggers on "cursor git", "git in cursor", "cursor version control", "cursor commit", "cursor branch", "@Git".

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with concrete prompts and commands, but it is a self-contained monolith that ignores the eight available reference files, and its risky merge-conflict workflow lacks an explicit resolution-verification step. Tightening decorative content and adding a verification checkpoint would lift the weaker dimensions.

Suggestions

Split the body into an overview that links the existing ./references/ files (e.g., 'See [best-practices.md](references/best-practices.md)' and 'See [examples.md](references/examples.md)') so progressive disclosure is one level deep and the bundle is actually navigated.

Add an explicit verification checkpoint to the Systematic Conflict Resolution Workflow before committing — e.g., 'git diff --check to confirm no conflict markers remain, then git add' — to close the validation gap on this destructive operation.

Trim the ASCII Source Control panel diagram and explanatory prose ('Cursor reads the staged diff and generates a message') to tighten token efficiency and let the actionable examples carry the content.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly actionable Cursor-specific content, but the decorative ASCII Source Control panel diagram and explanatory prose like 'Cursor reads the staged diff and generates a message' add padding that could be tightened; it does not sink to explaining basic concepts Claude already knows, so it is not a 1.	2 / 3
Actionability	Provides copy-paste-ready Chat prompts, executable bash commands (git merge, git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U, git checkout -b, git push -u), and complete .cursor/rules YAML configs — fully concrete and executable guidance throughout.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The Systematic Conflict Resolution Workflow and Feature Branch Setup are sequenced, but the conflict workflow — a destructive/risky operation — commits without an explicit verification checkpoint (e.g., checking no conflict markers remain), which per the rubric caps workflow clarity at 2.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Eight reference files exist in ./references/ (best-practices, examples, errors, advanced-git-operations, etc.) but the body never links to or signals any of them, leaving a monolithic ~238-line document with content that should be split out — matching the 'references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline' anchor.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong across all dimensions: it names four concrete actions, provides explicit trigger phrases, answers both what and when, and occupies a distinct Cursor-specific niche. No significant weaknesses.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple specific concrete actions — 'AI commit messages, @Git context, diff review, and conflict resolution' — matching the anchor for naming several distinct capabilities; uses imperative third-person voice with no first/second-person penalty.	3 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both what ('Integrate Git workflows with Cursor IDE: ...') and when (explicit 'Triggers on ...' guidance), satisfying the explicit-trigger requirement that would otherwise cap completeness at 2.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Explicit 'Triggers on' list covers natural user phrasings ('cursor git', 'git in cursor', 'cursor version control', 'cursor commit', 'cursor branch', '@Git') with several common variations a user would actually say.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The Cursor-IDE + Git niche with Cursor-qualified triggers ('cursor git', '@Git') makes it unlikely to fire for a generic git skill, giving it a clear distinct niche.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Commit: 3022dd3

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.