The description uses vague language like 'Execute reference architecture patterns' without specifying concrete actions. It doesn't explain what actions are actually performed (e.g., create files, configure settings, generate templates).

Has a 'Use when' clause and trigger phrases, but the 'what' portion is weak - 'Execute reference architecture patterns' doesn't clearly explain what the skill actually does. The when/triggers are present but the capability description is insufficient.

Includes some relevant keywords like 'cursor architecture', 'cursor project structure', 'cursor best practices', but the final trigger 'cursor' alone is overly generic and would match too broadly. Missing natural variations users might say.

While 'cursor architecture' and 'cursor project structure' are somewhat specific, the inclusion of just 'cursor' as a trigger creates high conflict risk with any other Cursor-related skills. The term 'reference architecture' helps but isn't enough to fully distinguish it.

The content is relatively brief but includes some unnecessary padding like the 'Prerequisites' section stating obvious requirements ('Understanding of project structure conventions') and the 'Output' section listing expected outcomes that don't add actionable value.

The instructions are entirely abstract and vague - 'Choose project structure', 'Create comprehensive .cursorrules file' provide no concrete guidance, code examples, or specific commands. There's nothing executable or copy-paste ready.

While steps are numbered, they lack any specificity about what each step entails, have no validation checkpoints, and provide no guidance on how to actually accomplish each task. 'Create comprehensive .cursorrules file' tells nothing about what should be in it.

The skill does reference external files for errors and examples (one level deep), but the main content is so sparse that it's unclear what value those references provide. The structure exists but the overview itself lacks substance to make the references meaningful.