Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured with executable commands and solution tables, but it functions as a flat reference catalog rather than a routed diagnostic workflow, and it fails to surface the existing implementation.md reference bundle that would offload detail from the main file.
Suggestions
Add a short routing step after the Step 1 diagnostic (e.g. 'Based on the HTTP code or symptom above, jump to Step 2–6') so the catalog becomes a guided workflow with explicit checkpoints.
Link references/implementation.md where relevant (e.g. under Step 4/5) so the validation, splitting, and rate-limiter code lives in the bundle instead of being omitted or duplicated inline.
Remove the meta 'Output' section and fold the 'Error Handling' table into Step 2 or Step 6 to eliminate redundancy and recover tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean tables and executable snippets assuming Claude's knowledge, but the 'Output' section is meta-fluff and the 'Error Handling' table duplicates the retry/backoff guidance already in Step 6, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout: executable curl diagnostics, ffprobe/ffmpeg commands, a retry-with-backoff TypeScript function, and solution tables with specific fixes keyed to error codes. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are numbered and Step 1 offers a triage diagnostic, but the body reads as a reference catalog rather than a routed workflow — there is no explicit 'if symptom X go to step Y' checkpointing or a validate→fix→retry feedback loop outside the single retry snippet. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and a real references/implementation.md bundle exists (audio validation, splitting, rate limiter, WebSocket test), but the body never signals or links that file, and inline code that could delegate to it keeps content that should be split sitting in the main file. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |