Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a substantive, well-organized migration guide with concrete code and a clear phased timeline, but it is held back by stubbed/illustrative code, missing inter-phase validation checkpoints, and an orphaned reference file that is not surfaced from the overview.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints between migration phases (e.g., 'Verify shadow-write results match legacy output before increasing traffic to 10%') to lift workflow_clarity to 3.
Surface the bundled references/implementation-guide.md from the body with a clearly signaled link (e.g., '## Deep dive — see [implementation-guide.md](references/implementation-guide.md)') and move the inline template/interface definitions there to improve progressive disclosure.
Replace the stubbed functions (assessCurrentSystem, sendViaLegacy/sendViaDocumenso) with executable, copy-paste-ready implementations or clearly mark them as placeholders to be filled in.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~270-line body is mostly efficient and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but the large ASCII phase diagrams, full TypeScript interface definitions, and the hardcoded example assessment data could be tightened to reduce token load. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete event mappings, a router pattern, and bash rollback commands, but key pieces are illustrative stubs — assessCurrentSystem returns hardcoded data, sendViaLegacy/sendViaDocumenso are undefined, and templates are recreated 'in the UI' rather than via executable code. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with a rollback section and timeline table is present, but for a risky batch/infra migration there are no explicit validation checkpoints between phases (e.g., verify shadow results match before cutover), which caps the score at 2 per the rubric's destructive/batch guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has section structure but is fairly monolithic with substantial inline content, and the bundled references/implementation-guide.md file is never referenced or surfaced from SKILL.md, so content that should be split out remains inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |