CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

documenso-reference-architecture

Implement Documenso reference architecture with best-practice project layout. Use when designing new Documenso integrations, reviewing project structure, or establishing architecture standards for document signing applications. Trigger with phrases like "documenso architecture", "documenso best practices", "documenso project structure", "how to organize documenso".

69

Quality

63%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/saas-packs/documenso-pack/skills/documenso-reference-architecture/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

89%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a well-structured skill description with strong completeness and distinctiveness due to its focus on the specific Documenso platform. The trigger terms are explicitly listed and natural. The main weakness is that the specific capabilities could be more concrete — listing actual actions like generating config files, setting up folder structures, or creating API integration boilerplate would strengthen specificity.

Suggestions

Add more concrete actions beyond 'implement reference architecture' — e.g., 'generates folder structure, configures API clients, sets up webhook handlers, creates signing workflow templates'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain (Documenso reference architecture) and mentions some actions like 'designing new integrations', 'reviewing project structure', and 'establishing architecture standards', but these are somewhat abstract rather than listing concrete, specific actions (e.g., no mention of specific files, configurations, or patterns being created).

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (implement Documenso reference architecture with best-practice project layout) and 'when' (designing new integrations, reviewing project structure, establishing architecture standards) with explicit trigger phrases provided.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Explicitly lists natural trigger phrases like 'documenso architecture', 'documenso best practices', 'documenso project structure', 'how to organize documenso', and also includes terms like 'document signing applications'. These are terms users would naturally say.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive due to the specific focus on 'Documenso' — a named product/framework for document signing. This is unlikely to conflict with generic document or architecture skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Implementation

37%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill provides a solid architectural overview with a clear project structure and useful ASCII diagrams, but falls short on actionability — it describes what to build without providing the actual implementation code for key components. The lack of a clear step-by-step workflow with validation checkpoints is a significant gap for what is essentially a project scaffolding and architecture guide. The content would benefit greatly from executable code examples for the core files and a sequenced implementation workflow.

Suggestions

Add executable TypeScript code for at least the core files: client.ts (singleton pattern), webhook handler.ts (with verification), and one service file — these are the most critical pieces a user would need.

Add a clear numbered workflow for setting up a new project: scaffold → configure → implement client → add services → set up webhooks → validate with verify-connection.ts → run tests, with explicit validation checkpoints.

Remove or significantly condense the ASCII architecture and data flow diagrams — the project structure tree already conveys the layering; a 2-line description of the layer rules is sufficient.

Move the error handling table and key design decisions into a referenced file (e.g., ARCHITECTURE-NOTES.md) to keep the main skill focused on actionable implementation steps.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary elements like the ASCII architecture diagrams and data flow diagrams that are verbose for what they convey. The 'Prerequisites' section explaining layered architecture principles and the 'Key Design Decisions' rationale column explain things Claude already understands. However, the project structure and tables are fairly lean.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides a concrete project structure and a setup script, but lacks executable code for the actual key files (client.ts, services, webhook handler, verify.ts). It describes architecture rather than providing copy-paste-ready implementations. The setup script only creates directories and an .env.example — it doesn't scaffold any actual TypeScript files.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

There is no clear multi-step workflow with sequencing or validation checkpoints. The skill describes architecture and structure but doesn't guide through a process of building, validating, or deploying. The setup script is a single step with no verification. There are no feedback loops for error recovery despite this being a complex integration setup.

1 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content references external skills ('documenso-sdk-patterns', 'documenso-multi-env-setup') which is good progressive disclosure, but there are no bundle files to support these references. The main content is somewhat monolithic — the ASCII diagrams and tables could be in separate reference files. The structure within the single file is reasonably organized with clear sections.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

9

/

11

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.